Larry Levitt

@larry_levitt · Oakland, CA · joined 30 Jun 2009

Executive Vice President for Health Policy, @KFF. Cal Bear.

32 391Followers

1 253Following

30 961Posts total

24.4KViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

Larry Levitt@larry_levitt22 Sep

As @axios notes this morning, this is very much a health care election. Both Democrats and Republicans are attacking the health care industry, but many Republicans have the political baggage of votes to cut Medicaid and opposition to enhanced ACA subsidies. @CookPolitical https:

9.1K views · 36 likes · 24 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

Larry Levitt@larry_levitt15 Sep

New Census numbers show the number of people uninsured held steady in 2025. BUT...That's before enhanced ACA premium subsidies expired, causing millions of people to drop coverage this year. And before Medicaid cuts start to hit next year. https://t.co/SzcBJ9pLtL

1.3K views · 7 likes · 8 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Larry Levitt@larry_levitt15 Sep

Looking at this poll, one has to imagine Democrats will be talking a lot this Fall about Republican cuts to Medicaid and the decision not to extend enhanced ACA premium subsidies. Republicans will try to blunt that with messages about health care fraud and TrumpRx. 1.9K views · 6 likes · 5 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Larry Levitt@larry_levitt14 Sep

This is a remarkable statistic. The U.S. government spends a lot on health care, plus all of our much higher private spending. That's because our health care prices are so much higher. And, for that, we don't have universal coverage and we have poorer outcomes in many respects. 2.7K views · 20 likes · 14 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Larry Levitt@larry_levitt14 Sep

If the U.S. is not achieving desired results on health care, it isn’t for lack of government spending. Isolating government health spending as a %GDP, the U.S. outspends most developed countries. https://t.co/KhMHr8Vwcy

7.8K views · 174 likes · 29 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →

Larry Levitt@larry_levitt10 Sep

Republicans are trying to frame Democratic efforts to increase the number of people with health insurance and subsidize premiums as lining the pockets of health insurers. Will be interesting to see if it works at all. 1.6K views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

6 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 10K–100K seguidores. aparece para muita gente, mas poucos desses espectadores reagem.

Mediana de visualizações2 286esta conta924mediana para 10K–100K

Alcance, %7.06%esta conta3.62%mediana para 10K–100K

Engajamento, %1.13%esta conta1.52%mediana para 10K–100K

Métrica	Esta conta	Mediana para 10K–100K	Proporção
Mediana de visualizações por post	2 286	924	2.47×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)	7.06%	3.62%	1.95×
Taxa de engajamento	1.13%	1.52%	0.74×

Outras contas desta faixa → Comparar com outra conta → Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.6K10 Sep

7.8K14 Sep

2.7K

1.9K15 Sep

1.3K

9.1K22 Sep

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.25%10 Sep

2.81%14 Sep

1.43%

0.84%15 Sep

1.50%

0.78%22 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes60.3%246 in total

Reposts19.9%81 in total

Replies7.4%30 in total

Quotes2.9%12 in total

Bookmarks9.6%39 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.