tweetindex
PT

Robotic Systems Lab

@leggedrobotics · Zurich, Switzerland · joined 07 Mar 2016

The Robotic Systems Lab designs machines, creates actuation principles, and builds up control technologies for autonomous operation in challenging environments.

38 268Followers
171Following
704Posts total
130KViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

VLMs don't understand a robot's body. How can a robot learn from its failures without retraining? PragmaBot: online in-context learning from real-world experience. The robot reflects on failures, stores lessons in memory, and retrieves them for new tasks. RA-L · #IROS2026 https
0:42
4.2K views · 51 likes · 7 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
We are releasing EgoHTR, a dataset with both human motions and terrain references, accepted @corl_conf. 📖 Paper: https://t.co/LHEQpqFrXG 🌐 Project Page: https://t.co/x12lTzVTDf • 55 scene-aligned sequences • 150k+ frames • rough-terrain environments • multi-modal 3D scene https
2:05
11.1K views · 42 likes · 9 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@leggedrobotics Thanks for this! I want to start looking into off policy methods for humanoids and this is very useful 🙏🏼 1.4K views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
This project is led by Gianluca Sabatini, supported by Chenhao Li @breadli428 and Marco Hutter @leggedrobotics. We thank Clemens Schwarke's implementation insights. Check out the paper! https://t.co/aVPFfzRecM 1.2K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
The implementation extends RSL-RL with same APIs, same training pipeline, same wrappers. ✅Swap the agent config, and you're running RSL-RL-SAC. Multi-GPU, RND, and symmetry augmentation are included out of the box. https://t.co/muvEjmdFYl 724 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
This project focuses on understanding the performance gap between PPO and SAC in massively parallel robot learning. While efforts like FlashSAC @hojoon_ai and FastSAC @younggyoseo explore separate development, RSL-RL-SAC is made to stay close to the widely used RSL-RL codebase.
1.6K views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
On humanoid tasks, SAC actually outperforms PPO. Entropy-driven exploration pays off in dense reward settings. Unitree G1: https://t.co/wLgAKplhqb
780 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
By adapting SAC for massively parallel simulation in IsaacLab, we match PPO across quadruped locomotion tasks — with a single set of hyperparameters, NO reward retuning needed. Unitree Go2: https://t.co/DYbufekzyg
853 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
To make SAC work well, we crystallize four major factors that matter: ✅Right-sizing the action space ✅Treating timeouts as timeouts, not failures ✅Smoother targets via n-step returns ✅Starting exploration where it should 1.4K views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
PPO has been the go-to algorithm for training robots in simulation. SAC is more sample-efficient in theory, but consistently fell short in practice. And while PPO thrives where data is cheap, it hits a hard wall when moving to real-robot learning. 🔥We set out to close that gap.
13.2K views · 23 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
PPO has long dominated robot locomotion training in simulation. SAC, despite its sample efficiency, couldn't keep up. We analyze why: 🔗https://t.co/w8cR5lgxjf 🔥Integrated into RSL-RL, our approach requires only minimal changes, making SAC a drop-in alternative out of the box. h
0:19
45.6K views · 343 likes · 42 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
We’re excited to be receiving one of these platforms for our research. Looking forward to exploring what we can build with it and contributing to the next wave of humanoid robotics. 7.6K views · 50 likes · 4 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Advancing dexterous manipulation through scalable visual sim-to-real transfer. We are excited to share our RSS paper, “ViserDex: Visual Sim-to-Real for Robust Dexterous In-hand Reorientation.” 🌐 Project page: https://t.co/eFi7QtKee9 1/N 🧵 https://t.co/YbKY5h6wmG
0:30
40.4K views · 199 likes · 20 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

2 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 10K–100K seguidores. aparece para muita gente, mas poucos desses espectadores reagem.

Mediana de visualizações7 649esta conta995mediana para 10K–100K
Alcance, %19.99%esta conta3.92%mediana para 10K–100K
Engajamento, %0.97%esta conta1.54%mediana para 10K–100K
MétricaEsta contaMediana para 10K–100KProporção
Mediana de visualizações por post7 6499957.69×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)19.99%3.92%5.10×
Taxa de engajamento0.97%1.54%0.63×

Outras contas desta faixa →   Comparar com outra conta →   Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

40.4K19 May
7.6K1 Jun
45.6K10 Jun
13.2K
1.4K
853
780
1.6K
724
1.2K
1.4K
11.1K15 Sep
4.2K22 Sep

Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.57%19 May
0.76%1 Jun
0.87%10 Jun
0.21%
0.86%
0.47%
0.64%
0.38%
1.10%
0.67%
0.44%
0.50%15 Sep
1.43%22 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.54%.

What the audience does

Likes55.4%748 in total
Reposts6.4%86 in total
Replies2.1%29 in total
Quotes1.2%16 in total
Bookmarks34.9%472 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Contas semelhantes