Natalie Wexler

@natwexler · Washington, DC · joined 20 May 2011

Free newsletter: https://t.co/t2u9KERy39. Author, Beyond the Science of Reading & The Knowledge Gap; co-author, The Writing Revolution.

19 029Followers

422Following

5 982Posts total

9.4KViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

Natalie Wexler@natwexler22 Sep

@natwexler Great article, roundup of recent discourse, and list of what can raise achievement. I think we should downplay, though, any expectation that this will close gaps, because everything that works…works best for those who already learn most easily. So gaps widen with imp 90 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Natalie Wexler@natwexler22 Sep

@natwexler If we agree that students need to become capable readers of lengthy, complex texts, why aren't we talking more about how much time children actually spend reading them? 107 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Natalie Wexler@natwexler22 Sep

@natwexler @tombennett71 Except, the CCSS are developmentally inappropriate; and cause maladaptive behaviors. 98 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Natalie Wexler@natwexler22 Sep

When kids struggle to meet academic standards, it can seem only fair to lower them--or make excuses. But that only perpetuates unfairness. Instead, let's harness cognitive science to enable more kids to MEET high standards. More in my new post: https://t.co/VbAkbghF81 https://

6.5K views · 53 likes · 11 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Natalie Wexler@natwexler13 Sep

@natwexler Do we have data that demonstrate the tools' helpfulness? Or is it that you 'can' get AI to do that, so it must be useful to teachers? Where are safeguards for development of teacher expertise? Or is the shifting of 'knowing what is a good idea and what is a bad idea' 170 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Natalie Wexler@natwexler13 Sep

Is the ed tech/AI backlash sweeping away tools that could actually promote learning? We need to be able to distinguish between helpful and harmful uses. More in my new post on Minding the Gap: https://t.co/jUJGartGgM https://t.co/Fz8EI85Ht1

1.1K views · 6 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Natalie Wexler@natwexler10 Sep

I had a great conversation with Michelle Brown of Common Lit about literacy and some widespread misconceptions that unintentionally hold kids back. Details here: https://t.co/x83BvQIUBF 676 views · 2 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Natalie Wexler@natwexler2 Sep

AI use can result in less student learning. Teachers need an understanding of cognitive science to make wise decisions about when to use it. @deansforimpact is developing an AI framework for teacher prep programs that could help. More in my new post: https://t.co/MMtsMaLCeT h

656 views · 4 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Natalie Wexler@natwexler1 Nov 2022

Interested in education, cognitive science, literacy--and fairness? Me too! And I have a free newsletter (no ads), where I post about those topics regularly. To make sure you don't miss an issue, please consider subscribing: https://t.co/yZiLA96OUM 0 views · 136 likes · 24 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

8 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 10K–100K seguidores. abaixo dos pares tanto em alcance quanto em engajamento.

Mediana de visualizações413esta conta924mediana para 10K–100K

Alcance, %2.17%esta conta3.62%mediana para 10K–100K

Engajamento, %0.94%esta conta1.52%mediana para 10K–100K

Métrica	Esta conta	Mediana para 10K–100K	Proporção
Mediana de visualizações por post	413	924	0.45×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)	2.17%	3.62%	0.60×
Taxa de engajamento	0.94%	1.52%	0.61×

Outras contas desta faixa → Comparar com outra conta → Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

6562 Sep

67610 Sep

1.1K13 Sep

170

6.5K22 Sep

107

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.07%2 Sep

0.59%10 Sep

0.80%13 Sep

0.59%

1.11%22 Sep

0.00%

3.74%

3.33%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes54.5%72 in total

Reposts12.9%17 in total

Replies4.5%6 in total

Quotes3.8%5 in total

Bookmarks24.2%32 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Posts recentes

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Contas semelhantes