tweetindex
PT

Michael S. Schmidt ✓

@nytmike · Washington D.C. · joined 17 Nov 2008

reporter @nytimes book: “Donald Trump v the United States” https://t.co/3fF07VHSZ0

218 371Followers
1 910Following
4 342Posts total
2.1MViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

@nytmike @WRashbaum @SantulN Ballmer rn: https://t.co/TTGS0KtiZH
33.7K views · 690 likes · 25 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
@nytmike @WRashbaum @SantulN I'm confused, I thought nothing was happening and Pablo Torre was crazy, that's what twitter told me! 17.4K views · 410 likes · 1 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@nytmike @WRashbaum @SantulN ESPN https://t.co/V4sE2Fe90c
GIF
34.3K views · 757 likes · 15 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@nytmike I know it must be tremendously embarrassing to be known as someone who helped spread the lie that Trump stole the 2016 election by colluding with Russia, but have some dignity, man. 70.7K views · 4.8K likes · 427 reposts · 47 replies Open on X →
@nytmike Was this stuck in drafts and got published a decade later? Or are you honestly retarded.. 4.9K views · 368 likes · 11 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@nytmike Dems should call for a Special Counsel to investigate Trump’s ties to Russia. 9.3K views · 361 likes · 5 reposts · 26 replies Open on X →
NEW: The trove of documents released by the White House last week about the Russia investigation shed new light on a longstanding question: Whatever happened to the counterintelligence investigation the FBI wanted done into Trump's ties to Russia? Short answer: It was sidetracked 531.1K views · 1.4K likes · 645 reposts · 525 replies Open on X →
.@TinaBrownLM weighs in on Paul Weiss: “It turns out that the only reason Karp et al. stood up to Trump in the first term was because there were no consequences for defiance. Moral courage was really moral vanity. The Trump reckoning moment exposed how costly the real work of 123.8K views · 319 likes · 92 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →
@nytmike This article is supposedly about why Brad Karp capitulated, but it doesn't answer: why? Also, why did you leave out the awful Epstein emails? Sure it's relevant to Karp's rapid capitulation to Trump that he had gotten himself deeply enmeshed with Trump's best friend Eps 3.6K views · 65 likes · 10 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Among the more remarkable things we found out was that Paul Weiss paid for associates to work on the Manhattan DA’s criminal investigation of Trump. In 20 years covering criminal investigations, I had never heard of such an arrangement in a criminal matter. 26.6K views · 171 likes · 48 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
NEW/EXCLUSIVE: Paul Weiss led the legal resistance during Trump’s 1st term. Dating back to Civil Rights era it stood up to the govt no matter who was in power. But it became one of the 1st institutions to bend knee to Trump. Here’s the inside story of how that happened 529.4K views · 827 likes · 300 reposts · 33 replies Open on X →
NEW: Top Cong Dems said in interviews that investigating Trump's law firm deals will be one way they use their power if they win back control of one or both houses. Dems made statements as they sent new letter to Skadden demanding info on deal with Trump. https://t.co/83UuGTC4OI 54.1K views · 95 likes · 49 reposts · 35 replies Open on X →
NYT top newsroom lawyer David McCraw: “This brazen act should be seen as nothing more than an attempt to prevent the public from knowing what is happening in their country by intimidating journalists from doing their jobs.” https://t.co/mmQ2mvSR7V 448.7K views · 2.7K likes · 1K reposts · 166 replies Open on X →
@nytmike Hatch act?!? Lol, trumps admin killed that. 1.6K views · 21 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
w/@katierogers @KannoYoungs 13.4K views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
NEW: Previously undisclosed incident involving White House leg affairs office - that ended up involving WH cos and VP's aides, and raised Hatch Act violation questions - illustrates very unusual situation POTUS/VP/their staffs find themselves in. https://t.co/hM6OVOmAEe 175.3K views · 70 likes · 21 reposts · 43 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

11 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 100K–1M seguidores. aparece muito além do próprio público, e esse público reage.

Mediana de visualizações33 673esta conta5 983mediana para 100K–1M
Alcance, %15.42%esta conta1.49%mediana para 100K–1M
Engajamento, %2.14%esta conta0.93%mediana para 100K–1M
MétricaEsta contaMediana para 100K–1MProporção
Mediana de visualizações por post33 6735 9835.63×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)15.42%1.49%10.3×
Taxa de engajamento2.14%0.93%2.30×

Outras contas desta faixa →   Comparar com outra conta →   Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.6K18 Jul
448.7K11 Jul
54.1K21 Jul
529.4K2 Aug
26.6K
3.6K
123.8K4 Aug
531.1K10 Aug
9.3K
4.9K11 Aug
70.7K
34.3K10 Sep
17.4K
33.7K11 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.28%18 Jul
0.87%11 Jul
0.34%21 Jul
0.22%2 Aug
0.85%
2.13%
0.34%4 Aug
0.49%10 Aug
4.25%
7.92%11 Aug
7.41%
2.25%10 Sep
2.38%
2.14%11 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes74.1%12 975 in total
Reposts15.3%2 671 in total
Replies5.2%907 in total
Quotes0.9%151 in total
Bookmarks4.6%799 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Contas semelhantes