tweetindex
PT

Henrik Karlsson

@phokarlsson · joined 02 Sep 2011

I write essays at https://t.co/Tf2yohMyM1 Right now thinking about writing-as-thinking, relationships, self-cultivation, LLMs

17 670Followers
437Following
5 755Posts total
1.5MViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

Any recommendations of really good interview books? I just finished reading the three that Martin Gayford did with David Hockney; they were fun! Another interview book, which I like even more, is the one Paul Cronin did with Werner Herzog. 3.6K views · 30 likes · 2 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →
which are the most labor intensive essays ever written? 4.5K views · 33 likes · 0 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@phokarlsson i think artists are on some kind of a spectrum with regards to how open they are to being buffeted around by the requirements of the work. Some seek to impose themselves. But what you describe is (for me) the kingly school of songwriting. 426 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Strangely, though, at the same time it requires you to be deeply self-attuned, because the only way to feel the latent structure of the song is to listen in to how the various possibilities resonate with you. But there is little space for choice. 1.2K views · 47 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
there will be a “right” way to extend the melody, add harmony to it, etc: it will tell you if you listen carefully. So it is really about letting go of ego and submitting to this structure outside of yourself. 1.4K views · 51 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
It is interesting how little freedom there is in creativity if you take it seriously. If I’m writing a song, I have some freedom when I make the first one or two choices—picking the first section of the melody, say. But after that the form really demands what comes next: 9.6K views · 170 likes · 7 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
A portrait of a person written purely by describing the imprints they have left in other people, the ways others are different because of their encounter. 1.4K views · 29 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@phokarlsson “The poet only asks to get his head into the heavens. It is the logician who seeks to get the heavens into his head. And it is his head that splits.” Chesterton It’s dangerous to your own health to treat people otherwise! 21 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@phokarlsson (How) Will doing this benefit me/them? 6.8K views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@phokarlsson Frisch: Thinking that you know the other is always the end of love. (...) But it's not b/c we know the other that our love ends, it's b/c our love ended that we think the other is complete. https://t.co/Oy2RaU5JOu 8.2K views · 107 likes · 9 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
treat people like they are too complex to fit in your head (link in next tweet) https://t.co/n4tiWEMoUV 577.1K views · 11K likes · 1.5K reposts · 14 replies Open on X →
I collected my thoughts in more detail here. https://t.co/DhuqFip3Uh 1.9K views · 8 likes · 3 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
The data is from Games of Go on Disk which transcribes games from pro tournaments. I suspect that it is pretty hard to cheat on a live pro tournament, but not sure what precautions they take. https://t.co/pr8OqmxIoJ 7K views · 24 likes · 2 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
There is a parallel here to cognitive apprenticeship theory, ie the idea that the reason cognitive skills are hard to learn is that we can't see them so you should externalize them for students. For humans to learn from AIs, perhaps making reasoning explicit is needed. 10.3K views · 124 likes · 16 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@phokarlsson That paper does not even once (that I can see) mention the hypothesis that better go AIs allow for easier cheating. 13.1K views · 60 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/O5gJAiY3mO 9.7K views · 48 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The significant improvements seems to have come not after May 2016 when AlphaGo was released but after October 2017 when Leela Zero was open sourced. 13K views · 107 likes · 12 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Ok, so this is interesting: it seems maybe the quality improved not after AlphaGo, but after the release of open source versions. Because they allowed players to look under the hood and understand the strategy. Just seeing the AI moves was not enough. https://t.co/8d1B1dsSzB http 23.8K views · 249 likes · 39 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
I think this is the root source of the graph. https://t.co/XZ1cuiC0X4 14K views · 37 likes · 4 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
"we estimated the time trends of decision quality only for the decisions that differed from the optimal AI decisions." which I take to mean that the graph above shows only the improved decision quality of moves that are not direct memorizations of moves done by AIs? 15.2K views · 48 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I saw the graph here, which links to original study: https://t.co/5Q6ZTiyPn1 19.4K views · 105 likes · 8 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Graph of decision quality among professional Go players. A sudden increase after AlphaGo. It is not only because they are learning from the AI. Players are suddenly inventing new moves at a faster rate too! https://t.co/sOyIcuvqDt 774.8K views · 3.2K likes · 479 reposts · 53 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

8 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 10K–100K seguidores. aparece muito além do próprio público, e esse público reage.

Mediana de visualizações1 388esta conta924mediana para 10K–100K
Alcance, %7.86%esta conta3.62%mediana para 10K–100K
Engajamento, %2.02%esta conta1.52%mediana para 10K–100K
MétricaEsta contaMediana para 10K–100KProporção
Mediana de visualizações por post1 3889241.50×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)7.86%3.62%2.17×
Taxa de engajamento2.02%1.52%1.33×

Outras contas desta faixa →   Comparar com outra conta →   Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

10.3K22 Jan
7K23 Jan
1.9K
577.1K25 May
8.2K
6.8K
215 Aug
1.4K9 Aug
9.6K
1.4K
1.2K
426
4.5K
3.6K10 Aug

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.42%22 Jan
0.43%23 Jan
0.69%
2.17%25 May
1.47%
0.06%
9.52%5 Aug
2.08%9 Aug
1.96%
3.84%
3.95%
0.94%
0.82%
1.14%10 Aug

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes64.0%15 451 in total
Reposts8.6%2 066 in total
Replies0.5%112 in total
Quotes1.3%319 in total
Bookmarks25.7%6 211 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

4 Sep

Daily snapshots since 04 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

Contas semelhantes