tweetindex
PT

Fred Stalder

@sudokuvariante

Trompettiste, professeur de trompette.

4 880Followers
370Following
48 594Posts total
29.7KViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

@sudokuvariante Great find, Fred. 102 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Results: Oseltamivir: The estimated absolute mean benefit from oseltamivir was 1·02 days (95% [BCrI] 0·74–1·31) overall IVM: Time to self-reported recovery was shorter in the ivermectin group compared with usual care (median decrease 2.06 days [1·00 to 3·06]) 3/n 127 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Interpretation: Oseltamivir: 1 day shorter duration of illness, treatment ok, IVM: 2 days shorter duration of illness, treatment not ok and please stop doing trials🤡 @CovidAnalysis 4/4 https://t.co/cADR3HLF2u
112 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
With Oseltamivir, Pr. Butler knows how to treat early (symptom duration of 72 h or less), not with IVM (symptoms lasting ≤14 days). 2/n 132 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Hey, I found another interesting comparison between 2 trials conducted by Chris Butler with opposite interpretation: 1/https://t.co/hO98vo4Iu6 ivermectin as covid treatment, open-label RCT. 2/ https://t.co/FMenQTngY2 Oseltamivir as flu treatment, open-label RCT. 1/n 1.7K views · 11 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
#Principletrial, #corruption. https://t.co/hO98vo5gjE Here are studies of drugs showing the same (or inferior) clinical result as ivermectin in which authors wrote a positive interpretation, opposite to principle trial authors: 1/n 1.7K views · 16 likes · 4 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Ok, here we are. Either NEJM data are right, either https://t.co/pKqTyCrkqw data are right. From supplement Figure S2A, we can compare data for ED visit, Hospitalization or Death. https://t.co/uVlXPwvbf3
10.9K views · 48 likes · 16 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
Bramante: big fraudulent data published in the @NEJM https://t.co/gpgcAFny4m Everything is fake in that study !!! 😱😱😱 1/n https://t.co/5tgV7UA2sn
14.9K views · 69 likes · 36 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

5 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de under 10K seguidores. alcança menos gente que os pares, mas os envolve muito mais.

Mediana de visualizações127esta conta4 175mediana para under 10K
Alcance, %2.60%esta conta250.82%mediana para under 10K
Engajamento, %3.15%esta conta1.41%mediana para under 10K
MétricaEsta contaMediana para under 10KProporção
Mediana de visualizações por post1274 1750.03×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)2.60%2.5× audience0.01×
Taxa de engajamento3.15%1.41%2.24×

Outras contas desta faixa →   Comparar com outra conta →   Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

14.9K24 Dec
10.9K
1.7K6 Jun
1.7K31 Aug
132
112
127
102

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.74%24 Dec
0.64%
1.40%6 Jun
0.88%31 Aug
4.55%
7.14%
3.15%
0.98%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.41%.

What the audience does

Likes63.1%157 in total
Reposts22.9%57 in total
Replies8.8%22 in total
Quotes0.8%2 in total
Bookmarks4.4%11 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

13 Sep

Daily snapshots since 13 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

Contas semelhantes