Trevor Potter

@thetrevorpotter · joined 15 Apr 2012

Campaign Finance & Election Law Expert, Fmr Commissioner & Chairman of Federal Election Commission, Attorney and President @CampaignLegal, Member @ElectionTask

10 163Followers

363Following

2 164Posts total

2.6KViews on collected posts

Posts recentes

Trevor Potter@thetrevorpotter1 Sep

Whistleblower revelations about the Postal Service’s reckless effort to implement the president’s illegal/unconstitutional mail voting executive order echo the findings of a new expert report filed by @CampaignLegal in federal court. 1/ https://t.co/BSQdAZLlLG 220 views · 0 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Trevor Potter@thetrevorpotter28 Aug

It has been a tumultuous week in the effort to stop the Trump administration from imposing an illegal and unconstitutional plan to interfere with voting by mail in this country - a plan blocked for the moment by the courts. Learn more in my newsletter: https://t.co/eblpbPhZWG 230 views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Trevor Potter@thetrevorpotter25 Aug

That power lies with the states and Congress. Just as we challenged both of his executive orders on elections to protect Americans’ freedom to vote, we stand ready to challenge any illegal actions taken by the federal government imposing additional barriers to the ballot. 6/ 148 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Trevor Potter@thetrevorpotter25 Aug

Full @CampaignLegal press statement below. 7/7 https://t.co/am9v4yR5sM 143 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Trevor Potter@thetrevorpotter25 Aug

We will immediately challenge any and all actions by the federal government to carry out the president’s unlawful executive order in response to this ruling, including the rule the USPS has indicated it will publish this week. The president cannot change our election rules. 5/ 141 views · 4 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Trevor Potter@thetrevorpotter25 Aug

…granting the current administration undue latitude to engage in anti-democratic actions. However, this decision is purely about the timing of court challenges — not the merits of the president’s case. 2/ 146 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Trevor Potter@thetrevorpotter25 Aug

This ruling does not remove anyone from the voter rolls, and Americans are still able to vote by mail according to the laws of their respective states. 4/ 119 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Trevor Potter@thetrevorpotter25 Aug

My statement on today’s SCOTUS ruling pausing a lower court order that had blocked President Trump’s second executive order on voting from going into effect: This order by the U.S. Supreme Court is yet another example of the highest court in the country… 1/ 909 views · 2 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Trevor Potter@thetrevorpotter24 Aug

As long as states insist on passing laws with confusing requirements or send voters inaccurate information about their registration, @CampaignLegal will continue to fight for the freedom to vote. Learn more about this lawsuit here: 3/3 https://t.co/xUvrTilOTA 73 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Trevor Potter@thetrevorpotter24 Aug

NEW LAWSUIT: @CampaignLegal and our co-counsel are challenging the confusing administration of a new law in South Dakota, which makes it harder for people to vote. We are proud to represent the @LWV of South Dakota and an individual plaintiff. 1/ 258 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Trevor Potter@thetrevorpotter24 Aug

This law and the way it is being implemented not only creates confusion and new barriers for voters, but it also violates the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 2/ 75 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Trevor Potter@thetrevorpotter19 Aug

A core principle of government ethics is the need to avoid conflicts of interest that can influence decision making on issues of national importance, including the regulation of pharmaceutical products. 1/ 185 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

12 posts dos últimos 90 dias, ao lado da faixa de 10K–100K seguidores. alcança menos gente do que contas do mesmo porte.

Mediana de visualizações147esta conta924mediana para 10K–100K

Alcance, %1.45%esta conta3.62%mediana para 10K–100K

Engajamento, %1.25%esta conta1.52%mediana para 10K–100K

Métrica	Esta conta	Mediana para 10K–100K	Proporção
Mediana de visualizações por post	147	924	0.16×
Alcance (visualizações ÷ seguidores)	1.45%	3.62%	0.40×
Taxa de engajamento	1.25%	1.52%	0.82×

Outras contas desta faixa → Comparar com outra conta → Como estas referências são construídas →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

18519 Aug

7524 Aug

258

90925 Aug

119

146

141

143

148

23028 Aug

2201 Sep

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.62%19 Aug

1.33%24 Aug

1.16%

0.00%

0.77%25 Aug

0.84%

0.68%

4.96%

1.40%

2.03%

3.04%28 Aug

0.91%1 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes45.9%17 in total

Reposts24.3%9 in total

Replies24.3%9 in total

Quotes5.4%2 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Posts recentes

Em comparação com contas do mesmo porte

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Contas semelhantes