tweetindex
RU

Retsef Levi ✓

@RetsefL · Cambridge, MA · joined 21 Jan 2023

Professor Retsef Levi, MIT Expert in Analytics, Risk Management, Health Systems, Food & Agriculture Systems, Manufacturing & Supply Chain Management

41 759Followers
1 818Following
2 820Posts total
264.6KViews on collected posts

Последние посты

@RetsefL @medrxivpreprint 🙏 1.4K views · 61 likes · 11 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
🔥EXCLUSIVE: Is MIT’s vaccine safety study too risky for peer review? MIT researchers found a potential safety signal in V-SAFE. A leading vaccine journal rejected the study without peer review—despite having published reassuring findings from the same CDC database. LINK 👇👇 https 19.8K views · 226 likes · 92 reposts · 13 replies Open on X →
@RetsefL @medrxivpreprint RICO. https://t.co/v3EQCCqIY9 2.4K views · 85 likes · 27 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@RetsefL @sonia_elijah @medrxivpreprint 100% agree!!! 1K views · 68 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@RetsefL You are really bad at critiquing the literature - you didnt even identify actual limitations of thr study and said a bunch of nonsense instead. Its really astounding. 306 views · 34 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@RetsefL TrinetX is junk data, run on a platform founded by Merck. You will not be able to see it and the authors almost certainly were not provided the IPD. TrinetX curate it and make sure that it doesn't show anything that would make pharma's products look bad. It is happeni 2.7K views · 114 likes · 20 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@RetsefL not to mention that TriNetX data is owned by The Carlyle Group, a private equity firm, having acquired it in September 2020.... TriNetX data also has inherent limitations including coding inaccuracies and omissions, and selection bias. This leads to misleading conclusi 2.9K views · 90 likes · 15 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
“Cardiac outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection versus BNT162b2 vaccination in adolescents and young adults: a cohort study of 4 million individuals” Is so outrageously flawed raising the question whether Vaccine is a scientific journal or purely propaganda operations. The htt 147.2K views · 1.1K likes · 377 reposts · 67 replies Open on X →
A baby dying shortly after birth from ruptured spleen is ‘classified’ by some as unvaccinated measles death based on positive antibodies test! Be assured that if the baby would be vaccinated against measles 2 days before, they will argue the cause of death is the spleen! The ht 40.3K views · 1.4K likes · 375 reposts · 69 replies Open on X →
@RetsefL @CDCgov Imagine that people who died probably didn't report on V-SAFE. The 1% is consistent with the estimate I used in my book. I also estimated 5% with sub-clinical issues (serious nonetheless). Where these numbers are flawed is the harm on the arterial hub with athe 9.6K views · 78 likes · 18 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
Hope state health authorities and congress/senate will demand @CDCgov to follow up with the VSAFE enrollees! @RonJohnsonWI @SecKennedy @NIHDirector_Jay @FLSurgeonGen @la_surgeon 6.3K views · 163 likes · 51 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Links: https://t.co/uVpyFgeLir https://t.co/jUmvFE1Bis 2.9K views · 106 likes · 33 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Our landmark autopsy study — which found 73.9% of deaths following COVID-19 “vaccination” were caused by the shots — was illegally retracted just days after becoming the #1 most-read scientific paper in the WORLD. Time to invoke the RICO Act against the Journal Cartel. https://t 27.5K views · 2.7K likes · 1.3K reposts · 35 replies Open on X →

На фоне аккаунтов своего размера

13 постов за последние 90 дней рядом с диапазоном 10K–100K подписчиков. показывается далеко за пределами своей аудитории, и она отвечает.

Медианные просмотры2 913этот аккаунт924медиана для 10K–100K
Охват, %6.98%этот аккаунт3.62%медиана для 10K–100K
Вовлечённость, %4.81%этот аккаунт1.52%медиана для 10K–100K
ПоказательЭтот аккаунтМедиана для 10K–100KОтношение
Медианные просмотры на пост2 9139243.15×
Охват (просмотры ÷ подписчики)6.98%3.62%1.93×
Вовлечённость4.81%1.52%3.16×

Другие в этом диапазоне →   Сравнить с другим аккаунтом →   Как считаются эти ориентиры →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

27.5K10 Aug
2.9K26 Aug
6.3K
9.6K
40.3K28 Aug
147.2K30 Aug
2.9K
2.7K
30631 Aug
1K2 Sep
2.4K
19.8K
1.4K

Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

14.97%10 Aug
4.84%26 Aug
3.39%
1.05%
4.67%28 Aug
1.09%30 Aug
3.81%
5.10%
12.09%31 Aug
6.75%2 Sep
4.81%
1.71%
5.06%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes65.5%6 207 in total
Reposts25.0%2 367 in total
Replies2.2%206 in total
Quotes1.7%162 in total
Bookmarks5.7%536 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Похожие аккаунты