tweetindex
RU

The MIT Press @mitpress.bsky.social

@mitpress · Cambridge, MA USA · joined 13 Feb 2009

Committed to the daily re-imagining of what a university press can be since 1962. | RTs ≠ endorsements

75 480Followers
3 035Following
33 107Posts total
165.2KViews on collected posts

Последние посты

"An inspiring deep dive into how humans might live, thrive and conceive future generations on Mars." @skyatnightmag reviews "Becoming Martian" by @ScottESolomon: https://t.co/fZl5QHhiMU 1.1K views · 8 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Not published by MITP, but obviously we love Carlo's work and figure a good chunk of our audience does too. This one looks marvelous. Congrats, @carlorovelli! 1.8K views · 15 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Out today !!!! 42.2K views · 819 likes · 75 reposts · 40 replies Open on X →
How does the architecture of a city shape the way we think, talk, and draw space? And how do spatial conventions travel across cultural generations? New paper in Open Mind: https://t.co/BCBehyjCBy #openaccess @fusaroli @jonasnoelle 2.3K views · 21 likes · 8 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
New this week from the MIT Press. Happy publication day to our authors! 📖 https://t.co/XVim7YfWSM
Four book covers on a purple gradient: "Better Tech" by Francine Berman, "Life's Chemical Secret" by Addy Pross, "Nary a Horse Left Standing" by Lee Alan Dugatkin, and "The Player and the Played" by Max Haiven.
10.4K views · 46 likes · 6 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Most philosophers prefer to keep madness at a safe distance. But to Wouter Kusters, the relationship is uncomfortably close: "Theoretical reflections have their practical counterpart in the breakdown of the mad." https://t.co/vtCXpTfaMM https://t.co/Q5ENhQetux
An illustration of a man looking at a knot of yarn spilling from his brain.

Headline: Is Madness Philosophy in Practice?

Subheading: Great thinkers have long kept psychosis at a safe distance. But those asking the biggest questions may find it uncomfortably close.

By Wouter Kusters
5.7K views · 158 likes · 28 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
New and #OpenAccess: In "On Minds," computer scientist Paul Rosenbloom offers reflections & perspectives on the study of minds arising from a multidecade career focused largely on cognitive architectures: https://t.co/sOzPFjhOWM https://t.co/M2YNtDwZvX 3K views · 43 likes · 19 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
New research published in @ImagingNeurosci suggests that even running at a "glacially slow" speed can boost your mood and increase brain function: https://t.co/6zynRTxLpl via @washingtonpost Read the full #OpenAccess study here: https://t.co/arJpYVG32T https://t.co/JcVdx6rXrL 1.4K views · 12 likes · 5 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
New and #openacess: "Building the American Green State," a history of the development of US federal and state environmental agencies and how the intersection of these agencies impacts policymaking today, by Christopher McGrory Klyza. https://t.co/HbMcWkOKef https://t.co/9KMMzrB6N 2.2K views · 6 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
AI’s future depends not only on what we build, but on whose terms. In @TIME, the authors of the forthcoming "When Machines Act" argue: Don’t ban data centers — require transparent, enforceable agreements that benefit their communities. https://t.co/HaCZF7ymtF 1K views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
New this week from the MIT Press. Happy publication day to our authors! 📖 https://t.co/j2UfDVlgtU 2.2K views · 26 likes · 8 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@mitpress @AdrianWoolfson @IEEESpectrum I think this is very exciting and has a lot of upside. However, human nature being what it is, I think the human and ecosystem damage that results as the collateral damage of maturing bioengineering at scale will dwarf the worst messes o 119 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@mitpress @AdrianWoolfson @IEEESpectrum Acid Instruction slop? GenomeHub? https://t.co/23vuuygEE4 279 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@mitpress @AdrianWoolfson @IEEESpectrum programming cells, not machines 159 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
"My prediction is that within 50 years, biology will be the engineering material of choice, and many of the people reading this article will become bioengineers." Terrific wide-ranging interview with @AdrianWoolfson at @IEEESpectrum: https://t.co/RuBHlQp7AE https://t.co/7y7iKHi6 34.7K views · 248 likes · 82 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
GitHub these days https://t.co/w3DamB1HUX 56.8K views · 1.8K likes · 125 reposts · 23 replies Open on X →

На фоне аккаунтов своего размера

11 постов за последние 90 дней рядом с диапазоном 10K–100K подписчиков. ровно на медиане своего диапазона подписчиков.

Медианные просмотры2 227этот аккаунт924медиана для 10K–100K
Охват, %2.95%этот аккаунт3.62%медиана для 10K–100K
Вовлечённость, %1.25%этот аккаунт1.52%медиана для 10K–100K
ПоказательЭтот аккаунтМедиана для 10K–100KОтношение
Медианные просмотры на пост2 2279242.41×
Охват (просмотры ÷ подписчики)2.95%3.62%0.82×
Вовлечённость1.25%1.52%0.82×

Другие в этом диапазоне →   Сравнить с другим аккаунтом →   Как считаются эти ориентиры →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1591 May
279
119
2.2K1 Sep
1K2 Sep
2.2K
1.4K3 Sep
3K
5.7K14 Sep
10.4K15 Sep
2.3K
42.2K16 Sep
1.8K
1.1K

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.63%1 May
0.72%
0.84%
1.53%1 Sep
0.40%2 Sep
0.36%
1.25%3 Sep
2.16%
3.47%14 Sep
0.51%15 Sep
1.28%
2.23%16 Sep
0.94%
0.94%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes75.2%3 207 in total
Reposts8.5%362 in total
Replies1.9%81 in total
Quotes0.9%37 in total
Bookmarks13.6%578 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Похожие аккаунты