tweetindex
TH

9/11 Revisited ✓

@911Revisionist · South Africa · joined 01 Mar 2023

“9/11 was an inside job,” or "dem djoos did it", is scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it".

86 744Followers
211Following
64 003Posts total
12.2MViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

@911Revisionist long before that ... https://t.co/JwtJ65yHg2 518 views · 14 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@911Revisionist @TeresaNacli https://t.co/1IJn2l48sw
242 views · 10 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@911Revisionist Where did all the file cabinets go? Why wasn't the WTC lobby buried by ~110 stories of furniture, office machinery, toilets, and more? Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study this evidence. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co
575 views · 9 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Remember the US Army Report of September 10th, 2001? https://t.co/Ao3vZEYzs2
1:45
47.3K views · 1.3K likes · 739 reposts · 37 replies Open on X →
The Notorious Banned 2001 Fox News Segment. The Israeli Mossad 9/11 Connection, and the 2002 Fox News Fallout that ensued. https://t.co/1dz3KrP8b3
31:11
4M views · 33.9K likes · 8.4K reposts · 247 replies Open on X →
@911Revisionist Fairy tale. 29 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@911Revisionist #$.0911 [they] started a 🔥 [they] Can't put out. Fake [News] network:; push,push, pull 🧨 Experts explained; 🐂 do do. https://t.co/FEawWnuBys 53 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@911Revisionist https://t.co/DQj2yn30fO 181 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@DebRN1953 Mr Ellison completed his grand design. Posting about what really happened in 911 is against the community guidelines. Today democracy died. For zionists you only can read about these fake bots lies. This is pure fascism. https://t.co/suzMGwL1Y2 238 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Shansville 9/11 Revisited 🧐 https://t.co/CDR5EL6ima 4.2K views · 89 likes · 24 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
Where did the Towers Go? 😶 9/11: Questioning Memories - Anakalupto & the AI Collective https://t.co/U7fNDELmBJ https://t.co/1gviEp7PR9 335 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
What was measured when the pieces of the Twins fell on the ground? 🤫 https://t.co/M086DCEQDQ 484 views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Aleister Crowley, Barbara Bush, George Bush and the 9/11 Connection 😶 https://t.co/eKVPU3E6ho 1.5K views · 18 likes · 9 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
A WTC Orphan - Building 3 Lyrics by @jasonpage, video edit done by me https://t.co/l64qSHGA0X 1.1K views · 12 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Most people do not understand the 9/11 attacks as well as they think they do, including most 9/11 “truthers.” Please study the following evidence and draw your own conclusions. 🧵 THREAD Humankind has made a major scientific discovery by learning to manipulate matter using https:
192.5K views · 216 likes · 104 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
@911Revisionist No working scientist or engineer uses the term "disintegration on a molecular level," because the only thing that could possibly mean is "vaporize," and we already have a one-word term for that. And, no, the buildings were not vaporized. 24.2K views · 164 likes · 1 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
@911Revisionist Steel buildings don't turn into dust from a plane collision and fire. They also don't fall straight down into their footprint unless they are demolished with carefully timed explosives. 15.8K views · 195 likes · 6 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
@911Revisionist @hunterlittleguy whatever it was I’m pretty sure the Israeli Jews did it. 13.3K views · 267 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
People think they know what they saw, because they were told to see a "collapse", but in actual fact, it was a disintegration on a molecular level. https://t.co/A7b99rSkrJ 7.8M views · 20.5K likes · 4K reposts · 858 replies Open on X →
“The Congress of the United States is Israeli occupied territory” -Pat Buchanan https://t.co/PsvC5GyGaZ
2:37
43.2K views · 2.4K likes · 650 reposts · 59 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

14 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม เข้าถึงคนน้อยกว่าบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน501บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การเข้าถึง, %0.58%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.29%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100Kอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์5019240.54×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)0.58%3.62%0.16×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม1.29%1.52%0.85×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.1K3 Sep
1.5K
484
335
4.2K6 Sep
238
181
53
29
4M9 Sep
47.3K10 Sep
57511 Sep
242
518

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.14%3 Sep
1.92%
1.45%
0.30%
3.01%6 Sep
0.84%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
1.07%9 Sep
4.64%10 Sep
1.74%11 Sep
5.79%
3.47%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes51.4%59 047 in total
Reposts12.1%13 881 in total
Replies1.1%1 240 in total
Quotes0.9%1 015 in total
Bookmarks34.6%39 785 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน