tweetindex
TH

C.D. Howe Institute

@CDHoweInstitute · Canada · joined 14 Sep 2010

Official account for the C.D. Howe Institute, Canada’s leading independent, nonprofit public policy research organization.

34 131Followers
3 229Following
14 581Posts total
3.6KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Thank you to our speakers for sharing their expertise and to our attendees for contributing to an engaging discussion at our latest roundtable, Cutting Edge: AI, Robotics, and the Future of Surgery in Canada. And thank you to our sponsor, @JNJMedTech. https://t.co/0zL8jYIZkQ
558 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@CDHoweInstitute Fair assessment. A 50% cut in the marginal effective tax rate on capital is meaningful, but I'd argue accelerated write-offs do nothing for the investor confidence problem. Policy consistency and after-tax returns remain the deeper issue. 5 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Immediate expensing is only part of the equation. Canada still needs to address its high corporate and personal tax rates and its deeper challenge: convincing investors that Canada is a place where long-term projects can generate solid returns. https://t.co/SezL3IY3HI 971 views · 11 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Parisa Mahboubi joins @therundowntvo with @JeyanTVO tonight to discuss Canada’s new permanent resident targets, reduced international student numbers and what this overall change in immigration strategy means for Canada and Ontario. Tune in at 8 pm or 11 pm on TVO. https://t.co/
808 views · 1 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
The C.D. Howe Institute is thrilled to announce this year's Regent Debate motion and debaters. Save your spot today: https://t.co/9oSi5Q7f1o https://t.co/de1ZQUwgUu
651 views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
As Alberta’s referendum brings renewed attention to fiscal relations within Canada, how does fiscal redistribution work across provinces? Brian Lewis and Yiming Sun discuss: https://t.co/hjMcU4Xwah 632 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

6 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม ต่ำกว่าบัญชีรุ่นเดียวกันทั้งการเข้าถึงและการมีส่วนร่วม.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน642บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การเข้าถึง, %1.88%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.36%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100Kอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์6429240.69×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)1.88%3.62%0.52×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม0.36%1.52%0.24×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

63216 Sep
65117 Sep
808
971
518 Sep
558

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.00%16 Sep
1.08%17 Sep
0.37%
1.65%
0.00%18 Sep
0.36%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes58.1%18 in total
Reposts25.8%8 in total
Replies6.5%2 in total
Bookmarks9.7%3 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน