tweetindex
TH

California Energy Commission - ⚡#CalEnergy

@CalEnergy · Sacramento, CA · joined 28 Jul 2010

🌞Where innovation meets action. As the state's primary energy policy & planning agency, we're driving California toward a clean, reliable & equitable future.

17 698Followers
2 228Following
18 745Posts total
22.2KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Your gas receipt shows the price, but not the full story. Global oil markets, taxes, refinery changes & consumer protections all play a role in what Californians pay at the pump. What really fuels gas prices? The facts might surprise you. Learn more: https://t.co/rqnkKvpogl ht
2:02
487 views · 2 likes · 2 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
👉View https://t.co/LexGetM9hw for more details. https://t.co/ReQoF2Rsxj
SEPTEMBER PUBLIC EVENTS: 

9/1: Corby Battery Energy Storage System Staff Assessment Meeting 

9/9: Energy Commission Business Meeting 

9/10: Workshop on Lithium Valley Vision  

Text says: September Public Events
9/18: Disadvantaged Communities Advisory Group Meeting 

9/24:  Hearing on Rulemaking to Amend Electric Vehicle Charger Reliability Standards 

9/29: Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) Symposium
250 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Join former U.S. DOE Secretary Jennifer Granholm, CPUC President John Reynolds, and CARB Chair Lauren Sanchez, and more energy leaders at the EPIC Symposium on Sept. 29. Register: https://t.co/JwAwKHHLZI Check out the event promo video: https://t.co/Z07iRx6f93 https://t.co/OFwJ
Text says: EPIC Symposium
Pictures of: U.S. DOE Secretary Jennifer Granholm,(middle) CPUC President John Reynolds, (on left) and CARB Chair Lauren Sanchez (on right.)
478 views · 0 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@CalEnergy Fvck you all you fvcked up hypocrites, I hope this blows up in your worthless faces, you assholes https://t.co/OAbCySN8Fo
53 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@CalEnergy Y’know what else “affects your fuel bill?” Crappy roads and unfilled potholes. But no! We don’t want to do anything logical, do we, @CalEnergy ? 🧐 54 views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@CalEnergy If you have to “sell it,” it isn’t worth buying. Your little tax-payer funded group needs to be abolished. What a shady bunch you are… 51 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Your tires can affect your fuel bill. CA’s new replacement tire efficiency standards could save drivers $180 per set in gasoline costs & Californians roughly $1B/year in refueling costs. Less wasted energy. More money staying in people’s pockets. More: https://t.co/AstFOIpwfw h
Text: A smarter tire.
A smaller fuel bill
Picture of a car.
641 views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 31 replies Open on X →
@CalEnergy Pound Sand Commies! https://t.co/KHQcs7sXme
445 views · 59 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@ZavalaA Nikki Woodward of course fails to mention that our “abundant access to efficient products” has gone hand in hand with greatly increased costs and lower quality for these same products. However, I have a hunch that neither she nor anyone else at @CalEnergy is interested i 5.7K views · 312 likes · 15 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@CalEnergy Let’s set the record straight. Californians would save billions if gas wasn’t taxed so much and if commissions like this didn’t come up with wacky regulations the people never for voted on. 411 views · 89 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@CalEnergy So, we have to go to Nevada for tires? Idiots. Idiots running the state. 445 views · 60 likes · 0 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
Let’s set the record straight on California’s tire efficiency standard. Learn more: https://t.co/0MWulkcOBQ https://t.co/2jtC1lP73F
Text says: 
CA New Replacement Tire Efficiency Standards
Saves Californians $1B in fuel costs every year
Supported by industry leaders, including Michelin and Discount Tire
No tradeoffs with safety or tire life
Small up-front cost pays for itself in months
Improves air quality – equivalent of removing 400K cars from road
Phased timelines – won’t take full effect until 2033
13.2K views · 8 likes · 9 reposts · 219 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

12 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม เข้าถึงคนน้อยกว่าบัญชีรุ่นเดียวกัน แต่ดึงการมีส่วนร่วมได้แรงกว่ามาก.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน445บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การเข้าถึง, %2.51%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การมีส่วนร่วม, %8.57%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100Kอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์4459240.48×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)2.51%3.62%0.69×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม8.57%1.52%5.64×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

13.2K18 Aug
445
41119 Aug
5.7K
445
64120 Aug
5121 Aug
54
53
47831 Aug
2501 Sep
487

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.90%18 Aug
14.38%
22.38%19 Aug
5.82%
13.71%
5.62%20 Aug
11.76%21 Aug
18.52%
11.32%
0.63%31 Aug
0.40%1 Sep
1.64%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes63.3%557 in total
Reposts3.8%33 in total
Replies29.9%263 in total
Quotes1.9%17 in total
Bookmarks1.1%10 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน