tweetindex
TH

Chris Masterjohn ✓

@ChrisMasterjohn · joined 19 Oct 2009

Mitochondrial health expert applying peer-reviewed science to develop evidence-based protocols for human health and longevity. Founder of https://t.co/p1KbY9pqx8.

80 362Followers
220Following
51 725Posts total
430KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

This is, on the one hand, very wise, yet on the other hand rather silly at the same time. Yes, mitochondrial dysfunction is not one thing and the idea that there is one thing everyone should take for their mitochondria is crazy so Picard is right to stay clear from 43.4K views · 357 likes · 27 reposts · 20 replies Open on X →
How to breathe — you’re doing it wrong. First, ignore anyone who tells you that you should always breathe in one particular way. Especially insidious is the camp that says “always breathe through your belly.” This is terrible advice. I think it comes from a fusion of several 28.6K views · 210 likes · 16 reposts · 19 replies Open on X →
It is completely immoral that the CDC has *any* proprietary data at all. That RFK couldn’t access it shouldn’t just lead him to fire one person. He should fire anyone who ever had anything to do with this. Trump should immediately order all such proprietary data made public and 60.3K views · 1.7K likes · 312 reposts · 29 replies Open on X →
“Now think…” No. Butter literally was foundational to modern nutritional science. Vitamins A and D were discovered through the finding that cod liver oil and butter both cured irreversible blindness. At first it was thought they were one vitamin. The discovery that they 163.9K views · 3.1K likes · 288 reposts · 74 replies Open on X →
Your cells are aging faster than you think. After age 18, mitochondrial density declines by 1% every year—one of the clearest biological markers of aging. By 70, you’ve lost more than half your cellular energy capacity. Here’s what most people miss: this decline isn’t 133.7K views · 586 likes · 57 reposts · 42 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

4 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม แสดงต่อคนมากกว่าบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน51 863บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การเข้าถึง, %64.54%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.52%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100Kอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์51 86392456.1×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)64.54%3.62%17.8×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม1.52%1.52%1.00×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

133.7K9 Aug
163.9K29 Aug
60.3K30 Aug
28.6K31 Aug
43.4K3 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.52%9 Aug
2.11%29 Aug
3.47%30 Aug
0.88%31 Aug
0.94%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes69.1%5 958 in total
Reposts8.1%700 in total
Replies2.1%184 in total
Quotes0.7%62 in total
Bookmarks19.9%1 718 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน