tweetindex
TH

Duncan Castles ✓

@DuncanCastles

Journalist • The Transfers Podcast • Sunday Times • Daily Record • @duncancastles.bsky.social • @TransfersCast https://t.co/x9k1gq6SbH

237 796Followers
2 187Following
41 961Posts total
423KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

@DuncanCastles And, you know what?, if he is making it up (now), that would still make him extremely stupid 3.2K views · 29 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@DuncanCastles There remains the possibility that this extends to VAR. The less experienced refs don’t dare argue with the more experienced official on VAR, so once sent to the monitor they have no option than to go with the review rather than stand by their on-field decision. 3K views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@DuncanCastles Also when Coote was exposed, the PGMOL were asked if they were going to introduce drug-testing and it was immediately dismissed. No-one seemed to press them on it, despite us now having hard evidence abuse happens. 1.7K views · 14 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Interesting that the response to this from Graham Scott (and other refereeing quarters) is that Mike Dean must be making his story up. Yet in the same article Scott writes that he "joined the Premier League list in 2015 and was bewildered by the culture that was permitted and 156.3K views · 470 likes · 58 reposts · 14 replies Open on X →
@DuncanCastles Mike Dean's a Kn0b. Always has been. Absolute messiah complex. 376 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@DuncanCastles I keep saying they’re cheats. They think all this makes them sound clever. They’re actually exposing themselves! 789 views · 21 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@DuncanCastles Millions of £ at stake and he’s having his little jokes in games to entertain himself 1.3K views · 23 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
A ‘professional’ referee… https://t.co/tmxqU0jFLl 256.4K views · 390 likes · 54 reposts · 29 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

8 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 100K–1M ผู้ติดตาม เข้าถึงคนน้อยกว่าบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน2 372บัญชีนี้5 983ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
การเข้าถึง, %1.00%บัญชีนี้1.49%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.97%บัญชีนี้0.93%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1Mอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์2 3725 9830.40×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)1.00%1.49%0.67×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม0.97%0.93%1.04×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

256.4K3 Sep
1.3K
789
376
156.3K4 Sep
1.7K
3K
3.2K

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.19%3 Sep
1.74%
2.66%
1.86%
0.35%4 Sep
0.98%
0.33%
0.95%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes74.4%963 in total
Reposts8.8%114 in total
Replies3.6%46 in total
Quotes1.8%23 in total
Bookmarks11.4%148 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน