Econlib

@Econlib · Indianapolis, IN · joined 05 May 2009

Part of the @Liberty_Fund Network - Economics for every life. Home of EconLog, EconTalk, the Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, and much more.

24 041Followers

2 857Following

42 917Posts total

3.1KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Econlib@Econlib10 Sep

Why do some conspiracies hold and others collapse? Jon Murphy (@jmurphy8289) applies a simple probability model — and explains why decentralized U.S. elections make large-scale fraud exponentially harder to hide. https://t.co/u2lTTXR45v 552 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Econlib@Econlib9 Sep

Rome wasn't built in a day, and its decline took Edward Gibbon six volumes. Join Peter Mentzel of Liberty Fund for part two of our 12-month VRG on Gibbon's classic, marking its 250th anniversary. Mon, Sept 21, 10-11:30am EDT. https://t.co/013CChUm3F 587 views · 5 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Econlib@Econlib8 Sep

Every town wants housing (or data centers, or waste sites) to go up "somewhere else." Michael Munger (@mungowitz) explains why that logic — individually rational, collectively ruinous — is a textbook prisoner's dilemma. https://t.co/tgpMX1U7ge 684 views · 7 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Econlib@Econlib5 Sep

Was Hamilton born a nationalist, or made one by war? His earliest Revolutionary writings sound like a Whig demanding rights. By war's end, he's arguing for a stronger union. Trace the pivot yourself before the Federalist Papers even begin. https://t.co/BbtZJ3Zupe 679 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Econlib@Econlib4 Sep

From 1980s Brazil to 1950s America: why "temporary" government interventions never seem to go away. Read the piece by Liberty Fund's Leonidas Zelmanovitz below: https://t.co/8F0MaxEWCE 610 views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

5 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม ต่ำกว่าบัญชีรุ่นเดียวกันทั้งการเข้าถึงและการมีส่วนร่วม.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน610บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %2.54%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.72%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	610	924	0.66×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	2.54%	3.62%	0.70×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	0.72%	1.52%	0.48×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

6104 Sep

6795 Sep

6848 Sep

5879 Sep

55210 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.66%4 Sep

0.29%5 Sep

1.17%8 Sep

1.19%9 Sep

0.72%10 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes69.0%20 in total

Reposts17.2%5 in total

Bookmarks13.8%4 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.