tweetindex
TH

Foreign Policy Research Institute ✓

@FPRI · Philadelphia PA USA · joined 12 Aug 2009

Nonpartisan foreign policy think tank. Join the conversation: https://t.co/gpEOozFWxj

33 857Followers
475Following
26 483Posts total
3.4KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Given Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s stated willingness to respond in kind to any Iranian development of nuclear weapons, Saudi Arabia arguably constitutes a significant proliferation risk. https://t.co/p1CSfix6rV https://t.co/hnf2nPfUk2 584 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Austin Long highlights three major changes in what he dubs the Second Nuclear Century: China is becoming a nuclear peer, Russia’s reliance on strategic weapons is growing amidst conventional weakness, and emerging technologies are rewriting tactical assumptions. Read more in the 734 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
🆕 China's Civil-Military Drone Fusion by Seth Hosford. https://t.co/mwysUbymF5 https://t.co/otPQIlf6ht 629 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
🗓️ Virtual Event | Wednesday, September 16 | 10:30 AM Join FPRI for a conversation discussing the origins of Anglophone and Francophone conflict in Cameroon, where it currently stands, and prospects for a peaceful settlement. Register here: https://t.co/FbpICkndAm. https://t. 500 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
In "Reading Germany's Rearmament," Julian Pawlak explains that the country has established its ends, ways, and means to becoming Europe's defense powerhouse, but that it still has to address capability issues. He emphasizes that to deliver on its new defense strategy, Germany htt 482 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
In his latest analysis piece, @DuitsmanMS explains how a coming US-Saudi Arabia nuclear agreement poses significant proliferation risks and could affect influence norms followed by other countries. The 123 Agreement allows Saudi Arabia to enrich uranium in exchange for US https 443 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

6 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม ต่ำกว่าบัญชีรุ่นเดียวกันทั้งการเข้าถึงและการมีส่วนร่วม.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน542บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การเข้าถึง, %1.60%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.09%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100Kอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์5429240.59×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)1.60%3.62%0.44×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม0.09%1.52%0.06×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

4432 Sep
482
500
629
7343 Sep
584

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.00%2 Sep
0.62%
0.00%
0.00%
0.41%3 Sep
0.17%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes55.6%5 in total
Reposts11.1%1 in total
Replies11.1%1 in total
Bookmarks22.2%2 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน