tweetindex
TH

Grid Gaming

@GridGamingIO · The Grid · joined 11 May 2020

Best HUB We support crypto: #BTC & more!

201 048Followers
88Following
6 109Posts total
389.2KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

If this unverified hint reflects current access, the gaming gap is structural: payment rails can connect in-game marketplaces, creator payouts, and player-to-player economies. Missing Solana support could leave that loop fragmented. https://t.co/NSzupGjSry 5.4K views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
GM 🎮 Does the claim that AI danger may exceed nuclear danger hit Web3 gaming hardest when autonomous systems can affect game economies and digital ownership without clear limits? https://t.co/m3kPeAmEFC
3.9K views · 2 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
If US policy stays unsettled, Web3 games need modular economies: separate gameplay, custody, identity, and settlement so one rule change does not force a full rebuild. Regulatory optionality is becoming an infrastructure feature. https://t.co/ynVpuwr2fr 62K views · 101 likes · 41 reposts · 20 replies Open on X →
Your inventory should feel like a living record of how you play. Skins, gear, badges, companions: not passive wallet trophies, but pieces of a player identity that travels, evolves, and earns meaning through play. 🎮💠 https://t.co/S1pZR9BheS
33.6K views · 118 likes · 46 reposts · 52 replies Open on X →
For Web3 games, regulatory clarity only matters if teams can build safer economies without adding more friction for players. https://t.co/qv9ymAC4IR 32.7K views · 122 likes · 47 reposts · 30 replies Open on X →
🇺🇸 BREAKING: Senate Republicans release new Clarity Act text, their “LAST, BEST AND FINAL” offer ahead of Tuesday’s crucial cloture vote, per Eleanor Terrett. The latest text revises DeFi-related provisions to the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), Stablecoin Yield and
251.6K views · 1.2K likes · 190 reposts · 66 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

6 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 100K–1M ผู้ติดตาม แสดงในวงกว้าง แต่มีผู้ชมตอบสนองน้อย.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน33 113บัญชีนี้5 986ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
การเข้าถึง, %16.47%บัญชีนี้1.57%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.42%บัญชีนี้0.99%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1Mอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์33 1135 9865.53×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)16.47%1.57%10.5×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม0.42%0.99%0.42×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

251.6K14 Sep
32.7K
33.6K15 Sep
62K16 Sep
3.9K17 Sep
5.4K18 Sep

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.57%14 Sep
0.61%
0.64%15 Sep
0.26%16 Sep
0.10%17 Sep
0.09%18 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.99%.

What the audience does

Likes72.2%1 498 in total
Reposts15.8%327 in total
Replies8.1%169 in total
Quotes1.3%26 in total
Bookmarks2.7%56 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน