InfStones Global ✓

@InfStones · Plano, TX · joined 18 May 2022

The Ultimate Web3 Infrastructure Platform(TM) supporting over 80+ blockchain protocols. Staking, Node Management, API Gateway, and Blockwatch.

60 375Followers

214Following

2 783Posts total

7.2KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

InfStones Global ✓@InfStones7 Sep

Reliable onchain agents need clear execution boundaries. BNB Agent Studio v3 integrates Turnkey, bringing wallet-level permissions and human co-signing to support more controlled execution across chains. https://t.co/UbguYl5fze 1.1K views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

InfStones Global ✓@InfStones3 Sep

Pasteur removed a scaling bottleneck. It did not raise BSC throughput on day one. Validators no longer re-execute builder bids, widening the builder window from ~30% to ~45% of the block interval. Gains arrive as builders integrate. All three BEPs: https://t.co/nGwJw4WR5e 1.1K views · 18 likes · 16 reposts · 26 replies Open on X →

InfStones Global ✓@InfStones2 Sep

Ethereum's entry queue is 2M+ ETH and about 36 days. The exit queue is near zero. We mapped what that queue asymmetry does to staking supply, yield, and capital timing. Full breakdown: https://t.co/JomPMexx8V 880 views · 17 likes · 16 reposts · 24 replies Open on X →

InfStones Global ✓@InfStones2 Sep

150ms finality won't make validator operations simpler. It shifts readiness toward BLS key management, tail latency, tested failover, and client strategy. Before Alpenglow mainnet, ask your operator these 8 questions: https://t.co/EFY9Hi1neg 958 views · 19 likes · 16 reposts · 26 replies Open on X →

InfStones Global ✓@InfStones8 Jun

We are looking forward to contributing to @UNDP's inaugural meeting of the Blockchain Advisory Group – a senior-level forum exploring responsible, scalable blockchain adoption for sustainable development. #BlockchainForDevelopment 3.2K views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

4 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม เข้าถึงคนน้อยกว่าบัญชีรุ่นเดียวกัน แต่ดึงการมีส่วนร่วมได้แรงกว่ามาก.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน1 008บัญชีนี้936ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %1.67%บัญชีนี้3.53%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %5.94%บัญชีนี้1.51%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	1 008	936	1.08×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	1.67%	3.53%	0.47×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	5.94%	1.51%	3.92×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

3.2K8 Jun

9582 Sep

880

1.1K3 Sep

1.1K7 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.31%8 Jun

6.37%2 Sep

6.48%

5.50%3 Sep

0.38%7 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.51%.

What the audience does

Likes33.2%64 in total

Reposts25.4%49 in total

Replies40.9%79 in total

Bookmarks0.5%1 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.