tweetindex
TH

JAMA Internal Medicine

@JAMAInternalMed · Chicago, IL · joined 07 Jul 2009

JAMA Internal Medicine is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.

109 504Followers
478Following
30 467Posts total
9.7KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

📝 Thinking about submitting your #ESCCongress research to @JAMA_current, @JAMACardio or another JAMA Network journal? 🎥 This video walks you through what to expect from the submission and peer‑review process. https://t.co/gE26I45Txz 2.9K views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@JAMA_current 📊 Research Summary: In patients undergoing #TranscatheterAorticValveImplant, factor Xa inhibitor non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant monotherapy was noninferior to acetylsalicylic acid for bleeding, thromboembolic events, and all-cause death. https://t.co/ 429 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Presented at #ESCCongress from @JAMA_current: After #TranscatheterAorticValveImplant, factor Xa inhibitor non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant monotherapy reduced hypoattenuated leaflet thickening vs acetylsalicylic acid monotherapy. https://t.co/PTbVmgxHsx https://t.co 2K views · 4 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
🧵 Presented today at #ESCCongress from @JAMA_current: Among patients with persistent #AFib and significant low-voltage zones, adjunctive low-voltage zone ablation improved 12-month arrhythmia-free survival vs pulmonary vein isolation alone. https://t.co/hfmEH1u5UT https://t.co 1.4K views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Presented today at #ESCCongress from @JAMA_current: Meta-analysis: In #TransthyretinAmyloidCardiomyopathy, transthyretin gene silencers reduced all-cause mortality and recurrent cardiovascular events vs placebo. https://t.co/JguWrDPu7t https://t.co/fxvUu3C00J 1.4K views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
✨ At #ESCCongress? Meet @JAMACardio Editor Barbara Casadei at booth K410 in the Publishers' Area today, Sunday, August 30, from 2:30-3:00 PM. 🌟Stop by to ask questions, discuss your research, and learn about publishing opportunities with the JAMA Network. https://t.co/BNYUAu 1.5K views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

6 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 100K–1M ผู้ติดตาม อยู่ที่ค่ามัธยฐานของช่วงผู้ติดตามพอดี.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน1 464บัญชีนี้5 983ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
การเข้าถึง, %1.34%บัญชีนี้1.49%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.00%บัญชีนี้0.93%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1Mอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์1 4645 9830.24×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)1.34%1.49%0.90×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม0.00%0.93%0.00×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.5K30 Aug
1.4K
1.4K
2K
429
2.9K31 Aug

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.00%30 Aug
0.00%
0.35%
0.49%
0.00%
0.00%31 Aug

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes44.4%8 in total
Reposts27.8%5 in total
Replies11.1%2 in total
Bookmarks16.7%3 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน