Katie Bergh

@Katie_Bergh

SNAP/WIC/Child Nutrition @CenteronBudget. Formerly @SenateAgDems @ChelliePingree. Michigander, runner, lady with the corgi. Also: https://t.co/zO3l3Xs1h5

1 502Followers

690Following

1 525Posts total

274.2KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Katie Bergh@Katie_Bergh14 Sep

@Katie_Bergh @nytimes The Daily did an episode on this in August! https://t.co/2XSR6QlSwv 2.1K views · 23 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Katie Bergh@Katie_Bergh14 Sep

Under the Republican reconciliation law, states are facing massive new costs based on their SNAP error rate — the extent to which they mistakenly gave families too much or too little in SNAP benefits. But outright denying SNAP to an eligible family doesn't count as an "error." 4.7K views · 156 likes · 21 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Katie Bergh@Katie_Bergh14 Sep

As SNAP enrollment in Arizona plummeted over the last year, it was clear that many families were being denied despite being eligible — often because they called & called but couldn't get through to complete the required interview. Now, we have the data: https://t.co/FWc0og15tE

138.5K views · 1.1K likes · 379 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →

Katie Bergh@Katie_Bergh27 May

@Katie_Bergh this is so fucking fucked 1.8K views · 66 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Katie Bergh@Katie_Bergh27 May

Under H.R. 1, states face massive cost-sharing penalties if they mistakenly give families too much or too little in SNAP. But delaying or denying benefits to eligible families doesn’t count as an “error,” creating an incentive for bureaucratic obstacles that worsen access. 1.5K views · 75 likes · 28 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Katie Bergh@Katie_Bergh27 May

Congress must act before even more eligible low-income families — including families with children — lose the food assistance they need to afford groceries, starting by delaying this SNAP cost shift for all states. https://t.co/lr8L5KKH1S 1.1K views · 82 likes · 26 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Katie Bergh@Katie_Bergh27 May

Most of H.R. 1's cuts didn't directly target children, but kids appear to be collateral damage from federal cuts that will shift huge new costs onto state budgets. As states scramble to respond, some are taking steps that make it much harder for eligible families to access SNAP. 1.5K views · 75 likes · 25 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Katie Bergh@Katie_Bergh27 May

Nationally, unemployment remained steady, real wages declined year-over-year in April, food insecurity remained high & grocery costs are rising. Yet 253,000 fewer kids are receiving SNAP in Texas. 205,000 kids in Arizona. 79,000 kids in Louisiana. 49,000 kids in Massachusetts. 2.5K views · 111 likes · 37 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Katie Bergh@Katie_Bergh27 May

Even short periods of food insecurity can have lasting consequences for children. Kids losing SNAP may also lose automatic enrollment in free school meals & streamlined access to WIC. And this harm is unfolding even before H.R. 1's cuts have fully taken effect. 2.5K views · 116 likes · 43 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Katie Bergh@Katie_Bergh27 May

NEW: In just the 12 states with available data, the number of children receiving SNAP has fallen by more than 700,000 since H.R. 1's unprecedented SNAP cuts were enacted last July — despite claims from Republican lawmakers that kids wouldn't lose benefits. https://t.co/GHJlzazTTM 118K views · 1.5K likes · 1.1K reposts · 60 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

3 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง under 10K ผู้ติดตาม แสดงต่อคนมากกว่าบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน4 745บัญชีนี้4 175ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K

การเข้าถึง, %315.91%บัญชีนี้250.82%ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.16%บัญชีนี้1.41%ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	4 745	4 175	1.14×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	3.2× audience	2.5× audience	1.26×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	1.16%	1.41%	0.83×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

118K27 May

2.5K

1.5K

1.1K

1.5K

1.8K

138.5K14 Sep

4.7K

2.1K

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

2.32%27 May

6.46%

6.06%

6.77%

9.85%

7.01%

3.93%

1.08%14 Sep

3.77%

1.16%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.41%.

What the audience does

Likes60.6%3 293 in total

Reposts30.0%1 631 in total

Replies1.5%81 in total

Quotes2.3%124 in total

Bookmarks5.6%307 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

โพสต์ล่าสุด

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน