Matt Baker

@MattBakerEnergy

Public Utility Commissioner in California. My tweets are my own. Retweets do not equal endorsements.

2 375Followers

1 578Following

2 234Posts total

58.7KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Matt Baker@MattBakerEnergy3 Sep

@MattBakerEnergy @ZavalaA Utility efforts to eliminate subrogation are not limited to inverse claims. Their real issue, regardless of inverse, is tail liability for giant fires. The CPUC has done nothing to help, other than to say fire victims should absorb the cost and utilities 1.9K views · 6 likes · 4 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Matt Baker@MattBakerEnergy2 Sep

@MattBakerEnergy @ZavalaA It only harms ratepayers bc you are okaying the rate increases the utilities ask for wo ensuring they take of their equipment so they don’t kill again. What, exactly, is the CPUC doing to crack down on utilities’ negligence in maintaining their equipmen 693 views · 10 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Matt Baker@MattBakerEnergy2 Sep

@MattBakerEnergy @ZavalaA Then why have CA's utilities posted record profits after starting wildfires....? They should be responsible for this, not ratepayers or taxpayers. Seems like since the 2018 Camp Fire, the IOUs have run roughshod over regulators again and again. 330 views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Matt Baker@MattBakerEnergy2 Sep

@ZavalaA Strict liability on utilities harms ratepayers. 50 billion $ in climate driven wildfire costs have been added to rates since 2020. The status quo makes ratepayers the insurer of the last resort. Wildfire is the enemy. 17.9K views · 21 likes · 12 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →

Matt Baker@MattBakerEnergy2 Sep

California's powerful electricity companies prevailed at the state capitol today as lawmakers scrapped a wildfire liability plan that left out their #1 wish. How much of a role did the stock market play in what just happened? https://t.co/MgHyP2Rs5x

5:09

37.8K views · 390 likes · 103 reposts · 56 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

5 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง under 10K ผู้ติดตาม เข้าถึงคนน้อยกว่าบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน1 939บัญชีนี้4 175ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K

การเข้าถึง, %81.64%บัญชีนี้250.82%ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.49%บัญชีนี้1.41%ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	1 939	4 175	0.46×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	81.64%	2.5× audience	0.33×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	1.49%	1.41%	1.06×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

37.8K2 Sep

17.9K

330

693

1.9K3 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.49%2 Sep

0.31%

2.42%

2.16%

0.72%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.41%.

What the audience does

Likes62.1%435 in total

Reposts17.3%121 in total

Replies11.3%79 in total

Quotes3.3%23 in total

Bookmarks6.0%42 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

โพสต์ล่าสุด

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน