tweetindex
TH

MESA/Boogie

@MesaBoogie · Petaluma, CA · joined 16 Mar 2009

Innovative Vacuum Tube Guitar & Bass Amplifiers since 1969

127 696Followers
402Following
5 717Posts total
21.1KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Each and every choice at Mesa/Boogie was a decision made with time and expertise. Whether seen or just felt, we made that choice with you in mind. Watch Chapter 2 of What Makes a Boogie here: https://t.co/czLmQ7TquE https://t.co/81PKWWPaEA 3.3K views · 42 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Turn a California Tweed 6V6 4:40 around and there's almost nothing on the back. Speaker outs, an effects loop, a reverb footswitch jack. Restraint was the rule through the whole design, and in the spirit of the genre, less is more. https://t.co/nU0Jj4jghq 👈 👍 https://t.co/3bCESE 4.2K views · 118 likes · 7 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
One of Mesa's greatest strengths is the depth of knowledge every one of our team members possess. That's what you get with every Mesa/Boogie; the proud work of a team obsessed with quality and tone. Check out Chapter 2 of "What Makes a Boogie" here: https://t.co/eQibpXOjmJ htt 3.4K views · 53 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@MesaBoogie Thank Christ, Doug is back. 13 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
The Badlander 50's reactive load comes stock, so it's protected with or without a cab. That load is what makes MESA's first built-in CabClone IR DI work. Eight cab captures per channel, XLR to the desk or headphones at 2am. https://t.co/N9oI1Z5E4Y https://t.co/1KTDN6a16S 4.5K views · 104 likes · 7 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@MesaBoogie It’s a good shoegaze platform. 35 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
The Fillmore looks like a vintage throwback. Both channels are wired identical underneath, same three modes, same tone stack, no headliner and no backup. Whatever pairing you need, neither side is playing second fiddle. https://t.co/ayRMoqm3BR https://t.co/y53DTrbSMM 5.7K views · 116 likes · 7 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

7 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 100K–1M ผู้ติดตาม แสดงไปไกลเกินผู้ติดตามของตัวเอง และผู้ชมก็ตอบสนอง.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน3 395บัญชีนี้5 983ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
การเข้าถึง, %2.66%บัญชีนี้1.49%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.59%บัญชีนี้0.93%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1Mอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์3 3955 9830.57×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)2.66%1.49%1.78×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม1.59%0.93%1.71×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

5.7K22 Aug
35
4.5K24 Aug
1325 Aug
3.4K26 Aug
4.2K31 Aug
3.3K2 Sep

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

2.20%22 Aug
0.00%
2.52%24 Aug
0.00%25 Aug
1.59%26 Aug
2.98%31 Aug
1.37%2 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes88.7%433 in total
Reposts4.7%23 in total
Replies0.6%3 in total
Quotes0.6%3 in total
Bookmarks5.3%26 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน