Shane Christopher Frakes ✓

@OldVetSymposium · The Minds Eye · joined 24 Jul 2021

28 512Followers

4 566Following

39 933Posts total

15.2KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Shane Christopher Frakes ✓@OldVetSymposium8 Sep

I was on a date, and it was going well. Then we started talking about eating habits, and she said the words that made my heart flutter: “I love Kodiak Pancakes for dinner.” I immediately interrupted with, “Kodiak Pancakes, peanut butter, honey, and syrup?” That was all I 2.7K views · 61 likes · 4 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →

Shane Christopher Frakes ✓@OldVetSymposium8 Sep

Real access doesn’t come from knowing the right people or repeating the right language. It takes years of being pushed through things most people would never tolerate. That’s why very few people ever get close to it. Many people speak as though they understand what “access” 1.9K views · 36 likes · 4 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →

Shane Christopher Frakes ✓@OldVetSymposium8 Sep

@OldVetSymposium This dangerous AI that you call NHI can synthetically induce emotions. 14 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Shane Christopher Frakes ✓@OldVetSymposium7 Sep

@OldVetSymposium All of existence is part of a broader spectrum than we currently understand. 😊 49 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Shane Christopher Frakes ✓@OldVetSymposium7 Sep

@OldVetSymposium There is a lot of truth to this from: natural light, to artificial home/office light, tv, phones, etc... the social engineering implications are huge. 82 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Shane Christopher Frakes ✓@OldVetSymposium7 Sep

Awareness matters less than learning how to use and protect your mind in a world where electromagnetics can alter perception in countless ways. We will eventually discover that emotional intelligence exists on a much broader spectrum than we currently understand. The most 2.9K views · 77 likes · 14 reposts · 18 replies Open on X →

Shane Christopher Frakes ✓@OldVetSymposium6 Sep

You control your dreams, or your dreams will control you. 2.5K views · 64 likes · 3 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →

Shane Christopher Frakes ✓@OldVetSymposium6 Sep

@OldVetSymposium They encountered me. 44 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Shane Christopher Frakes ✓@OldVetSymposium5 Sep

@OldVetSymposium Oh they still have no clue, neither humans or the others… 🦾👽 https://t.co/AH4GinP0c9

GIF

214 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Shane Christopher Frakes ✓@OldVetSymposium5 Sep

@OldVetSymposium If these sorts of phenomena exist, it would make sense that genetics affecting brain structure & activity would be implicated. Does this involve any genetic biotech beyond what's public and known? (Or beyond what was public at some prior time, e.g. earlier use of 175 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Shane Christopher Frakes ✓@OldVetSymposium5 Sep

Genetics is central to the phenomenon in a way I haven’t seen anyone else seriously address. For years, the government poured money into research and classified programs built around the belief that they could identify, manipulate, or even create the genetic characteristics they 3.4K views · 58 likes · 1 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →

Shane Christopher Frakes ✓@OldVetSymposium5 Sep

Rev 14:16 Combination of AI-managed infrastructure, biological and neural monitoring, digital-identity architecture, algorithmic-mediated advisory functions, and the emergent coordination properties documents will exist regardless of any specific choice... https://t.co/CdudgSKKmm

1.2K views · 7 likes · 4 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

12 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม เข้าถึงคนน้อยกว่าบัญชีรุ่นเดียวกัน แต่ดึงการมีส่วนร่วมได้แรงกว่ามาก.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน696บัญชีนี้968ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %2.44%บัญชีนี้3.43%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %2.46%บัญชีนี้1.91%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	696	968	0.72×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	2.44%	3.43%	0.71×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	2.46%	1.91%	1.29×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.2K5 Sep

3.4K

175

214

446 Sep

2.5K

2.9K7 Sep

148 Sep

1.9K

2.7K

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.19%5 Sep

2.02%

1.71%

1.40%

2.27%6 Sep

3.34%

3.73%7 Sep

3.66%

2.04%

7.14%8 Sep

2.65%

2.67%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.91%.

What the audience does

Likes69.4%313 in total

Reposts6.7%30 in total

Replies14.4%65 in total

Quotes0.4%2 in total

Bookmarks9.1%41 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

โพสต์ล่าสุด

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน