Dr Ömer Atilla Ergi

@OmerAtillaErgi · Victoria - Australia · joined 02 Jul 2013

PhD philosophy - MTh Islamic Theology - Dip Physics

17 154Followers

3 015Following

34 306Posts total

27KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Dr Ömer Atilla Ergi@OmerAtillaErgi22 Sep

“Anthropomorphic bir tanrıya inanmam” dedikten sonra tanrıyla evren aynı şey demek paradoksal bir iddia. İslam akidesinde zaten anthropomorphic bir tanrı yok. Fakat panteizm evrendeki her parçacığa uluhiyet isnad ediyor, bir tanrıyı reddedip, trilyonlarca tanrıyı kabul ediyor. 1.6K views · 112 likes · 44 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Dr Ömer Atilla Ergi@OmerAtillaErgi21 Sep

Mustafa hoca (!) sonunda tanrısını bulmuş (malumun ilamı). Gerçi Panteist mi, Panenteist mi henüz karar vermemiş. Yani tanrı evrenin kendisi mi, yoksa evren tanrının içinde mi, ya da enerji mi veya çip mi, henüz karar verememiş. 5.8K views · 122 likes · 31 reposts · 23 replies Open on X →

Dr Ömer Atilla Ergi@OmerAtillaErgi20 Sep

“Sandığımız kadar düzenli değil”mi? Her gezegen kütlesine ve güneşe mesafesine göre belirli bir hızla yörüngede dolanıyor ve tüm sistem galaksinin merkezindeki Sagittarius A* isimli kara delik etrafında 250 milyon yılda bir tur atıyor. Şu düzeni görememek akıl tutulmasıdır. 8K views · 243 likes · 100 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →

Dr Ömer Atilla Ergi@OmerAtillaErgi20 Sep

Teknolojik gelişimle zekasal gelişim adeta Makusen mütenasip gibi. Yani teknoloji geliştikçe zeka seviyesi geriliyor. Bu sorulara ortaokul seviyesine fen bilimi okuyan her hangi bir öğrenci cevap verebilmeli. 4.6K views · 93 likes · 38 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Dr Ömer Atilla Ergi@OmerAtillaErgi19 Sep

Semavi dinlerin Sümerlerden geldiğini savunan ateistlerin Ebla tabletlerinden bahsetmemesi çok enteresan. 4,500 yıllık Ebla tabletlerinde Adem, İbrahim, Davud, İsmail, Mikail gibi isimler var. Tufandan bahseden Gılgamış tabletleri ise 4,000 yıllık. Yani 500 yıl sonrasına ait. htt

7K views · 373 likes · 205 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

5 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม แสดงไปไกลเกินผู้ติดตามของตัวเอง และผู้ชมก็ตอบสนอง.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน5 765บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %33.61%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %4.41%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	5 765	924	6.24×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	33.61%	3.62%	9.28×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	4.41%	1.52%	2.90×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

7K19 Sep

4.6K20 Sep

5.8K21 Sep

1.6K22 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

8.30%19 Sep

2.95%20 Sep

4.41%

3.05%21 Sep

10.15%22 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes65.0%943 in total

Reposts28.8%418 in total

Replies3.0%44 in total

Quotes0.1%1 in total

Bookmarks3.0%44 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.