Congressman Bill Foster ✓

@RepBillFoster · Naperville, IL · joined 11 Jan 2013

Scientist. Businessman. Proud to represent the 11th Congressional District of Illinois.

50 804Followers

1 193Following

9 760Posts total

167.5KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Congressman Bill Foster ✓@RepBillFoster16 Sep

Speaker Johnson canceled votes AGAIN, sending Congress home until November 9. At a critical time for our country, when AI companies are asking to be regulated, the Speaker has decided the House should go home and do nothing. 3.4K views · 36 likes · 7 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

Congressman Bill Foster ✓@RepBillFoster16 Sep

My colleagues and I on the Science Committee sat down with representatives from OpenAI, Anthropic, Hugging Face, and METR to discuss rogue hacking incidents by AI agents. Congress must move with urgency to address risks posed by rogue AI. We cannot stay on the sidelines of this

5.4K views · 129 likes · 18 reposts · 94 replies Open on X →

Congressman Bill Foster ✓@RepBillFoster16 Sep

Software-only solutions will not be enough to protect against AI risks. Air gapping, similar to what they use in nuclear weapons security, should be used to secure high-level research and ensure advanced AI doesn't get into the wrong hands. https://t.co/aO5yjp4Ikg

1:07

2.2K views · 46 likes · 16 reposts · 39 replies Open on X →

Congressman Bill Foster ✓@RepBillFoster15 Sep

One of the biggest risks with AI is recursive self-improvement—where AI agents continuously code better versions of themselves that could evade human oversight. I spoke to @ABCNewsLive about one of the technically feasible ways Congress can address this. https://t.co/gg0ULglKxz

0:43

1.7K views · 62 likes · 8 reposts · 21 replies Open on X →

Congressman Bill Foster ✓@RepBillFoster9 Sep

Anyone who has read METR's Technical Report on the OpenAI/Hugging Face incident will understand that software-only controls will not be sufficient to contain superhuman AI. Any continuing work on adversarial superhuman intelligence must rely on the physical containment methods 154.8K views · 1.8K likes · 243 reposts · 166 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

5 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม แสดงไปไกลเกินผู้ติดตามของตัวเอง และผู้ชมก็ตอบสนอง.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน3 394บัญชีนี้927ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %6.68%บัญชีนี้3.40%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %4.56%บัญชีนี้1.54%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	3 394	927	3.66×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	6.68%	3.40%	1.96×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	4.56%	1.54%	2.97×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

154.8K9 Sep

1.7K15 Sep

2.2K16 Sep

5.4K

3.4K

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.48%9 Sep

5.33%15 Sep

4.80%16 Sep

4.56%

1.47%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.54%.

What the audience does

Likes67.6%2 107 in total

Reposts9.4%292 in total

Replies10.5%326 in total

Quotes1.9%60 in total

Bookmarks10.7%334 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

โพสต์ล่าสุด

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน