Possum Reviews ✓

@ReviewsPossum

I'm a possum and I find garbage.

105 478Followers

16Following

45 733Posts total

6.1MViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Possum Reviews ✓@ReviewsPossum13 Sep

@ReviewsPossum @StirlingWisdom you don't find me repulsive, do you? 170.8K views · 8.9K likes · 22 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Possum Reviews ✓@ReviewsPossum13 Sep

@ReviewsPossum If you even have a “favorite porn star” you are repulsive 69.5K views · 1.1K likes · 4 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Possum Reviews ✓@ReviewsPossum12 Sep

@ReviewsPossum No, your mom adores me. 61.4K views · 1.4K likes · 6 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Possum Reviews ✓@ReviewsPossum22 Mar

@ReviewsPossum AI detectors have probably harmed more innocent students than actual cheaters 67.9K views · 3K likes · 80 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →

Possum Reviews ✓@ReviewsPossum22 Mar

@ReviewsPossum An AI text detector is AI telling you AI made everything, kind of like how black history works 22.3K views · 546 likes · 19 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →

Possum Reviews ✓@ReviewsPossum22 Mar

@ReviewsPossum None of these tools work at all, including the expensive paid options. They are objectively terrible. My academic writing consistently gets picked up at 60+% and if you use any tool like Grammarly, even for the "Correctness" fixes, it simply increases it even more. 52.5K views · 543 likes · 11 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Possum Reviews ✓@ReviewsPossum22 Mar

This AI text detector says Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address was written by AI. https://t.co/lHRueLktyj

3.5M views · 28K likes · 2.7K reposts · 420 replies Open on X →

Possum Reviews ✓@ReviewsPossum21 Mar

I ran some of my writing through an AI checker. 29.7% robot-generated! Thing is, it obviously wasn't. Ethical and creative reasons aside, the book in question is nearly a decade old - well before technology could do this. 1/3 https://t.co/UqFgurEyz4

2.2M views · 2.5K likes · 388 reposts · 107 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

3 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 100K–1M ผู้ติดตาม แสดงไปไกลเกินผู้ติดตามของตัวเอง และผู้ชมก็ตอบสนอง.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน69 506บัญชีนี้5 906ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M

การเข้าถึง, %65.90%บัญชีนี้1.59%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M

การมีส่วนร่วม, %2.37%บัญชีนี้1.04%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	69 506	5 906	11.8×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	65.90%	1.59%	41.4×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	2.37%	1.04%	2.27×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.2M21 Mar

3.5M22 Mar

52.5K

22.3K

67.9K

61.4K12 Sep

69.5K13 Sep

170.8K

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.14%21 Mar

0.89%22 Mar

1.06%

2.58%

4.50%

2.37%12 Sep

1.54%13 Sep

5.25%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.04%.

What the audience does

Likes86.6%46 035 in total

Reposts6.1%3 255 in total

Replies1.1%559 in total

Bookmarks6.2%3 292 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

14 Sep

Daily snapshots since 14 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

โพสต์ล่าสุด

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Followers by day

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน