TH

Elsevier | Scopus

@Scopus · Amsterdam · joined 30 Jan 2009

Turning complexity into clarity with expertly curated abstracts, citations, and enriched data, linking scholarly literature across diverse disciplines.

71 254Followers

487Following

8 139Posts total

5KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Elsevier | Scopus@Scopus9 Sep

The final paper reflects a series of decisions. Many happen early. Sources. Inclusion. Structure. Librarians help guide those decisions. Nominate a librarian for recognition. https://t.co/K3HPXC8zKo #LibrarianImpact https://t.co/zhFv6gSwo5

0:45

696 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Elsevier | Scopus@Scopus3 Sep

Getting to an answer isn’t enough. Not all information is reliable. What matters is whether it can be trusted. Librarians help guide the decisions behind that trust. Nominate a librarian for recognition. https://t.co/0zq3OFxtiC #LibrarianImpact https://t.co/bREL6YBsAh

0:40

946 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Elsevier | Scopus@Scopus26 Aug

A project can look complete but still not be as robust as it should be. A librarian asks: “What might be missing?” That question often leads to stronger outcomes. Nominate a librarian for recognition. https://t.co/ioUjQ94LLw #LibrarianImpact https://t.co/dmwDPoMOlV

0:45

1.1K views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Elsevier | Scopus@Scopus24 Aug

Great research tests itself. 🔍 LeapSpace's Claim Radar searches 150 years of peer-reviewed literature for evidence that supports or contradicts your hypothesis, all from one query. Try it in LeapSpace: https://t.co/GA89kI5kJ0 https://t.co/qIrelOzSwj

0:47

1K views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Elsevier | Scopus@Scopus18 Aug

The final paper reflects a series of decisions. Many happen early. Sources. Inclusion. Structure. Librarians help guide those decisions. Nominate a librarian for recognition. https://t.co/QPgngU5hmT #LibrarianImpact https://t.co/F5i0l62oQz

0:45

1.3K views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

5 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม ต่ำกว่าบัญชีรุ่นเดียวกันทั้งการเข้าถึงและการมีส่วนร่วม.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน1 040บัญชีนี้997ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %1.46%บัญชีนี้3.69%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.19%บัญชีนี้1.61%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	1 040	997	1.04×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	1.46%	3.69%	0.40×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	0.19%	1.61%	0.12×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.3K18 Aug

1K24 Aug

1.1K26 Aug

9463 Sep

6969 Sep

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.32%18 Aug

0.48%24 Aug

0.19%26 Aug

0.00%3 Sep

0.00%9 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.61%.

What the audience does

Likes81.8%9 in total

Reposts18.2%2 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน