Joshua Siegel

@SiegelScribe · Washington D.C. · joined 27 May 2014

Energy Congress reporter @politico. Co-host POLITICO Energy podcast. Writer, reader, kabob eater. Chi sports fan. Tennis hack. joshuasiegel@politico.com

12 323Followers

6 242Following

15 084Posts total

40.2KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Joshua Siegel@SiegelScribe22 Sep

And a scooplet this am: Manufacturing CEOs with @ShopFloorNAM sent a letter to EPW/ENR committee leaders, Thune, and Schumer calling for a permitting deal now, and for the House to come back and act on it. "Manufacturers cannot afford inaction," it reads https://t.co/D5S42xqwbE 5.6K views · 18 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Joshua Siegel@SiegelScribe22 Sep

NEW in ME: Time running short on pre-elex permitting reform deal. Thune wants answers today. POTUS was briefed and gave his blessing for his team and Rs to cut a deal. But Trump admin's attacks on wind, along w/ transmission are among outstanding issues https://t.co/tX0MVNRYxr

13.4K views · 64 likes · 14 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Joshua Siegel@SiegelScribe18 Sep

“It's going to be very hard to get Democratic votes for a new permitting reform law that the Trump administration will violate,” Sen. Whitehouse told me. “That means they need to do stuff to end their current violations of law." 509 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Joshua Siegel@SiegelScribe18 Sep

But...all the same caveats apply. A big one: the Defense Department’s ongoing refusal to issue normally routine onshore wind approvals is weighing on Democrats and remains a "problem" that needs to be resolved for a deal to happen, ENR ranking member Martin Heinrich told me 557 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Joshua Siegel@SiegelScribe17 Sep

Capito told me she would “love” to have a bill on the floor next week, but she conceded a resolution “may drag” into the 3rd and final week of their work session. Majority Leader Thune told @jordainc "we'll see within the next 24, 48 hours" whether there's going to be a deal 747 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Joshua Siegel@SiegelScribe17 Sep

In a meeting today, National Energy Dominance Council staffers briefed Energy Sec Chris Wright on partial legislative text that Senate negotiators sent to the White House over the weekend, two sources familiar with the talks told me 1.1K views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Joshua Siegel@SiegelScribe17 Sep

More here w @ameliadavidson_: Democrat blocks fast-track passage for data center ratepayer bill https://t.co/XeDG3OFh3y 2.6K views · 9 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Joshua Siegel@SiegelScribe17 Sep

Heinrich tells me coming off the floor the issue of data center related energy costs “won't get fixed with a voluntary agreement.” “If voluntary worked we'd already be there,” he added 2.4K views · 14 likes · 6 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Joshua Siegel@SiegelScribe17 Sep

Heinrich formally OBJECTS to UC on the floor, saying ratepayer protection act “falls short” 4.7K views · 11 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Joshua Siegel@SiegelScribe17 Sep

Heinrich, the Energy Committee ranking member, notably has his own bill that I scooped last month that he told me would give “teeth” to the White House's ratepayer protect pledge https://t.co/yWak7TwEMg 4.4K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Joshua Siegel@SiegelScribe17 Sep

👀Heinrich tells me “stay tuned” on whether he will object to UC of ratepayer protection act 4.3K views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

11 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม แสดงในวงกว้าง แต่มีผู้ชมตอบสนองน้อย.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน2 583บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %20.96%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.55%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	2 583	924	2.80×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	20.96%	3.62%	5.79×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	0.55%	1.52%	0.36×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

4.3K17 Sep

4.4K

4.7K

2.4K

2.6K

1.1K

747

55718 Sep

509

13.4K22 Sep

5.6K

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.26%17 Sep

0.20%

0.34%

0.88%

0.43%

0.55%

1.07%

0.90%18 Sep

0.98%

0.64%22 Sep

0.43%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes65.1%153 in total

Reposts11.9%28 in total

Replies2.6%6 in total

Quotes6.0%14 in total

Bookmarks14.5%34 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

19 Sep

Daily snapshots since 19 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

โพสต์ล่าสุด

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Followers by day

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน