David Aardsma

@TheDA53 · In the Pen · joined 22 Mar 2011

10yr MLB Vet. Ik zal u missen Greg. My Oh My! #KEEPWORKING The Quiet Mind Answers @RiceBaseball Analyst on @MLBNetworkRadio, @Espn and @TheBackPage

10 814Followers

559Following

25 458Posts total

1.4MViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

David Aardsma@TheDA5315 Sep

No, you are absolutely wrong here. As a member of media and being a player, playing in the game does not equal talk to media. Health comes first. But that does not excuse Oregon from not making his issues clear to the media post game. Lanning should understand that 670 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

David Aardsma@TheDA5315 Sep

If you are healthy enough to play in a game, you are healthy enough to talk to media. We might be annoying but we are not taxing. Also you know where this excuse def won’t fly? The NFL. 271.7K views · 245 likes · 8 reposts · 563 replies Open on X →

David Aardsma@TheDA537 Sep

No they werent bad, but heavily dependent run the ball or throw to the TE Its different, more spread out and this is what we through we were getting for years with Drew Allar but never got. We couldn’t win the big game cause we were never able to do this when it mattered most 924 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

David Aardsma@TheDA537 Sep

Ok, and at least the world is getting closer to right 1.4K views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

David Aardsma@TheDA536 Sep

What is this revision of history that James Franklin teams were terrible 750K views · 11K likes · 167 reposts · 102 replies Open on X →

David Aardsma@TheDA535 Sep

Umpires are the problem!!!! This is so stupid 97K views · 438 likes · 12 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

David Aardsma@TheDA535 Sep

Another theoretical win for the SEC 626 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

David Aardsma@TheDA534 Sep

Even the A’s broadcast called out what the umps did after Vargas hit a batter https://t.co/r9QeIpvq7X

1:48

272.2K views · 2.6K likes · 64 reposts · 24 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

8 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม แสดงในวงกว้าง แต่มีผู้ชมตอบสนองน้อย.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน49 186บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %454.83%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.34%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	49 186	924	53.2×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	4.5× audience	3.62%	126×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	0.34%	1.52%	0.22×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

272.2K4 Sep

6265 Sep

97K

750K6 Sep

1.4K7 Sep

924

271.7K15 Sep

670

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.01%4 Sep

0.00%5 Sep

0.47%

1.51%6 Sep

0.36%7 Sep

0.32%

0.32%15 Sep

0.00%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes90.7%14 367 in total

Reposts1.6%251 in total

Replies4.4%694 in total

Quotes0.5%75 in total

Bookmarks2.9%452 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.