tweetindex
TH

Tyler O'Neil ✓

@Tyler2ONeil · Washington, DC · joined 11 Feb 2011

Senior Investigative Reporter, @DailySignal. Author, Making Hate Pay (2020, 2026) & The Woketopus. Husband, Father, Eagle Scout, @Hillsdale grad. RT =/ endorse

37 796Followers
4 069Following
46 062Posts total
16.1MViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

“Invading a church during a worship service and terrifying the families and children in attendance has never and will never be protected under the First Amendment,” @doug_wardlow, her colleague, added. 🧵11/12 660 views · 26 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The callous disregard for the people who went to Cities Church to exercise their First Amendment right to worship in peace reminds me of what Don Lemon said about that "type of Christianity" based in "white supremacy." 🧵12/12 https://t.co/G4XA8FMw18 https://t.co/H2wAz8q8k0 648 views · 28 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
“That there was no intent to interfere with religious worship services is absurd,” @ReneeKCarlson, who represents @citieschurch, told me. “The mob of agitators interrupted the pastor’s sermon with whistles and chants, including ‘who shut this down? We shut this down!’” 🧵10/12 523 views · 27 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Sheer callousness: The motion dismisses worshippers' terror as being "emotionally upset," & says their disturbance is "precisely the reason" to dismiss charges. Tell that to the worshippers who feared an active shooter, or to the boy who heard his parents were Nazis.😡 🧵9/12 htt 593 views · 29 likes · 6 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The motion asks the judge to dismiss the case because "The threat [that] a prosecution would violate fundamental constitutional liberties necessitates a full determination of the validity of the charges." What about the fundamental liberties of worshippers? 🧵8/12 https://t.co/1Q 579 views · 28 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The agitators claim the government is charging them "to retaliate" against them for their speech and for choosing "a venue for their message at a church that is politically aligned with the government." No, the church's perceived politics have nothing to do with it. 🧵7/12 http 634 views · 26 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
NOTE: The motion cites Snyder v. Phelps, in which the Supreme Court protected protesters carrying offensive signs near a military funeral. Where were the protesters? 1,000 FEET AWAY from the church. This precedent doesn't strengthen the agitators' case, it weakens it. 🧵6/12 640 views · 32 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
"The Defendants chanted political slogans, made statements of political opinions, at most loudly and in a manner that was verbally confrontational." The motion claims the action "cannot be criminalized" simply because it "happened to take place in a church." 🧵5/12 https://t.co/ 722 views · 27 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The motion claims, "Ultimately, the government seeks to controvert the right to free speech and freedom of assembly where the protest occurred in a church. The Constitution does not contain any exception to free speech in churches." 🧵3/12 https://t.co/iQeSSt1vCp 853 views · 25 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
"There are no allegations supporting a conclusion that Defendants' actions were intended to interfere with freedom of worship." Yes, it actually says that. Last I checked, staging a "takeover" of a service inherently involves interfering with freedom of worship. 🧵4/12 https:// 789 views · 37 likes · 6 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Before getting into it, a brief reminder. The 38 agitators allegedly: 1⃣Stood up and blocked the aisles 2⃣Chanted slogans, including "Who shut this down? We shut this down!" 3⃣Told kids their parents were going to hell 4⃣Blocked parents from kids 🧵2/12 https://t.co/GAsddH9q7i h 1.5K views · 41 likes · 11 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
You can't make this up. Michigan AG Dana Nessel invokes Esther in urging Jewish Democrats to sacrifice "their own future" to save humanity because climate change or something👀 This from the same Dana Nessel who skipped her party's nominating convention due to concerns about 619 views · 4 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
DENIED The SPLC tried to sever its case from that of Heidi Beirich. Judge Emily Marks said no. This delays the trial from Oct. 5 to Feb. 1. 🧵1/7 https://t.co/D0WW1yZvmY https://t.co/dbHu9Tckoh 2.6K views · 77 likes · 29 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
The latest Jane's Revenge revelations underscore the Biden administration's double standard on abortion violence. If an international leftist terror network backed the pregnancy center firebombings, why did it take so long for us to hear about it? https://t.co/gehbtOebbI https: 701 views · 6 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
New development: why is a "conservative" group defending the SPLC? https://t.co/y5HGWZxBus 2.6K views · 89 likes · 13 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
'CONSERVATIVE' GROUP DEFENDING SPLC?🤔 Today, Society for the Rule of Law moved to file an amicus brief in U.S. v. SPLC, suggesting the DOJ engaged in vindictive prosecution. I can't help but wonder, what sort of conservative group takes the SPLC's side? 🧵1/15 https://t.co/MXXL3 63.1K views · 560 likes · 190 reposts · 68 replies Open on X →
@Tyler2ONeil This is a hate group 5.6K views · 951 likes · 36 reposts · 22 replies Open on X →
Here's my article on the indictment https://t.co/ptct1OAKee 24.5K views · 1.7K likes · 260 reposts · 42 replies Open on X →
I wrote the book about the SPLC back in 2020, and I released an updated version last month. 🧵20/20 https://t.co/kYpCa1yTyl https://t.co/3h2PkXAUdu 46.1K views · 3.1K likes · 479 reposts · 48 replies Open on X →
I've repeatedly explained why the charges in the indictment make sense. The SPLC built its reputation by suing the KKK into bankruptcy, but now it smears mainstream conservatives and Christians, juicing the numbers on the "hate" it claims to oppose. 🧵18/20 https://t.co/DvE3SHFVJ 46.9K views · 3.1K likes · 432 reposts · 23 replies Open on X →
Here's my testimony on the issue before @JudiciaryGOP last month. https://t.co/0pZRs3npsV https://t.co/UoAKrobYqn 44.9K views · 2.8K likes · 426 reposts · 25 replies Open on X →
Upon conviction of the conspiracy to conceal money laundering charge, the SPLC shall also forfeit any property involved in that offense. 🧵17/20 https://t.co/MQAiUxbjpu 47.7K views · 2.6K likes · 323 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
The indictment states that, upon conviction of the wire fraud counts, the SPLC "shall forfeit to the United States... any property, real or personal, which represents or istraceable to the gross receipts obtained" in violation of the law. 🧵16/20 https://t.co/FWUMh7Bq1k 51.9K views · 2.8K likes · 353 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
Finally, the indictment claims the SPLC conspired to commit concealement money laundering, aiming to conceal "the true nature, source, ownership, and control of fraudulently obtained donated money the SPLC paid to the Fs." 🧵15/20 https://t.co/bj7eZzTZEN 56K views · 2.8K likes · 373 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
The indictment also brings bank fraud charges, mentioning specific statements an SPLC employee made to a bank that later conflicted with the SPLC CEO's statements to the bank. 🧵14/20 https://t.co/vVzFDuFtfN 99.7K views · 2.8K likes · 366 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
8⃣UNITED KLANS OF AMERICA The SPLC paid F-18, who led "a millennial reboot of what was once a serious domestic threat." 🧵12/20 https://t.co/O6CVzDGXmg 66.2K views · 2.9K likes · 347 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
WIRE FRAUD The indictment mentions specific payments SPLC allegedly made under false pretenses. The indictment claims SPLC aimed "to obtain money via donations through materially false representations and omissions about what the donated funds would be used for." 🧵13/20 https:/ 67.3K views · 3K likes · 430 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
7⃣AMERICAN FRONT The SPLC paid F-43 $19K. This person was national president of American Front, and is a convicted felon for participating in a cross burning. 🧵11/20 https://t.co/YacKaLGkGX 85.4K views · 3K likes · 415 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
6⃣NAZI The SPLC paid $350K to an officer of the National Socialist Movement and Aryan Nations-affiliated Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club. 🧵10/20 https://t.co/W9RJWoFgbO 101.6K views · 3.5K likes · 511 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
4⃣NEO-NAZI FEATURED SPLC gave $155K+ to F-42, former chairman of the Neo-Nazi National Alliance. At the same time, SPLC featured this field source on its "Extremist File" webpage. 🧵8/20 https://t.co/9caN460avP 111.9K views · 3.3K likes · 452 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

14 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม เข้าถึงคนน้อยกว่าบัญชีรุ่นเดียวกัน แต่ดึงการมีส่วนร่วมได้แรงกว่ามาก.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน654บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การเข้าถึง, %1.73%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การมีส่วนร่วม, %4.89%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100Kอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์6549240.71×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)1.73%3.62%0.48×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม4.89%1.52%3.22×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

7011 Sep
2.6K
6192 Sep
1.5K
789
853
722
640
634
579
593
523
648
660

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.28%1 Sep
4.12%
1.29%2 Sep
3.44%
5.70%
3.63%
4.57%
5.94%
5.05%
5.70%
6.07%
6.12%
4.94%
4.85%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes84.8%39 515 in total
Reposts11.8%5 500 in total
Replies0.6%300 in total
Quotes0.2%97 in total
Bookmarks2.6%1 203 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน