tweetindex
TH

Andrés Miguel Torrubia Sáez ✓

@antor · In Silico & In Vivo · joined 07 Nov 2008

Biodrug design @ AI ∩ biology

14 798Followers
478Following
8 949Posts total
1.3MViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Reminder it's now been 2 years since Draghi's EU competitiveness report https://t.co/6ggoxV7nN1 and nothing has been done. Furthermore the EU has gone in opposite direction (eg https://t.co/uVGN6m5kpW). 1.3K views · 19 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
We don't always need explainability. 2.2K views · 11 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
How far will they go after monitoring? 1.9K views · 8 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
In 2025, Keytruda (pembrolizumab) was the number one drug for global sales ~$32 billion, targeting PD-1, for cancer immunotherapy. But we didn't know precisely how it works until today @ScienceMagazine https://t.co/uIt3jDXzWW https://t.co/xnxlg6burf https://t.co/Y8oYKHiA2k
94.7K views · 859 likes · 200 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →
If Anthropic believes "AI" could kill all humans and they are the sacred ones to save us from it, it only follows that sooner rather than later they will attempt to obliterate or take control other powerful AIs. There can only be one true religion, and it's ours. 1.2K views · 6 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
BREAKING: Anthropic is reportedly building an extensive surveillance and intelligence system to monitor activists and protests opposing artificial intelligence, according to The Prospect. https://t.co/rLwZ25s3wC
1.2M views · 16.9K likes · 4.1K reposts · 377 replies Open on X →
Would Openai or Anthropic disclose if a model discovers a polynomial time integer factoring algorithm that breaks many modern crypto? First, they would start disclosing new families of AI-resilient algorithms and we'd have to believe they are safe, unless formally proven to be. 1.5K views · 13 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

7 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม แสดงต่อคนมากกว่าบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน1 930บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การเข้าถึง, %13.04%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.15%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100Kอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์1 9309242.09×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)13.04%3.62%3.60×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม1.15%1.52%0.76×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.5K10 Sep
1.2M
1.2K
94.7K
1.9K11 Sep
2.2K
1.3K14 Sep

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.19%10 Sep
1.93%
0.94%
1.15%
0.62%11 Sep
0.65%
1.88%14 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes67.5%17 854 in total
Reposts16.2%4 286 in total
Replies1.5%396 in total
Quotes4.4%1 166 in total
Bookmarks10.4%2 756 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน