tweetindex
TH

Arvind Subramanian

@arvindsubraman

Senior Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics; Former Chief Economic Adviser, Govt. of India;

169 204Followers
76Following
3 331Posts total
198.2KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

@arvindsubraman Only one decoupled from reality is you. Tweeting like a cheap troll, what a fall from grace. 1.2K views · 85 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@arvindsubraman No. Garg's was an attempt at a political hit job calculated to create a buzz and drown out the good news. That you now put lipstick on that pig shows you to be the ponce that you are, masquerading as a serious academic. "Trust deficit" is one of those hollow phr 2K views · 72 likes · 14 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@arvindsubraman @IndianExpress @abhishekecon @FelmanJosh @sardesairajdeep How can you be so craven and continue to torch your credibility in the econ profession, when even first year undergraduate will understand how measurement series change the estimates ? 1.3K views · 15 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
4. Most important: applying logic of govt. claims about plausibility of latest nos. imply that GDP growth estimates for previous 15 years, including those for new series, are overstated (figure) What's sauce for the goose now must also be sauce for the gander in the past https: 22.6K views · 55 likes · 16 reposts · 14 replies Open on X →
1. The latest numbers are plausible on the technical merits, and even plausible directionally because some other co-incident macro-indicators are suggesting rising activity 12K views · 48 likes · 4 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
2. Trust deficit govt. has created on many data issues lends credence to doubts expressed by a former govt. official that downward revisions to past data are aimed at boosting current numbers Burden of proof is on govt. to restore trust by fully publishing data & methodology 82.1K views · 70 likes · 14 reposts · 37 replies Open on X →
.@IndianExpress piece by @abhishekecon @FelmanJosh & me on latest GDP numbers and the raging controversy Link: https://t.co/pmn7UBJ8PT I will discuss this with @sardesairajdeep at 930 PM IST (1130 EST) Four take-aways Thread 1/ https://t.co/XQhm1tp73L 77K views · 386 likes · 117 reposts · 34 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

7 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 100K–1M ผู้ติดตาม แสดงต่อคนมากกว่าบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน11 985บัญชีนี้5 983ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
การเข้าถึง, %7.08%บัญชีนี้1.49%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.74%บัญชีนี้0.93%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1Mอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์11 9855 9832.00×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)7.08%1.49%4.75×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม0.74%0.93%0.79×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

77K4 Sep
82.1K
12K
22.6K
1.3K
2K
1.2K5 Sep

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.74%4 Sep
0.18%
0.46%
0.40%
1.43%
4.46%
7.17%5 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes52.4%731 in total
Reposts12.2%170 in total
Replies6.7%93 in total
Quotes4.7%65 in total
Bookmarks24.1%336 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน