Daniel Cuthbert

@dcuthbert · Airport lounges. · joined 21 Apr 2008

Documentary photographer, old creaky hacker. Co-author of @OWASP ASVS standard. Blackhat/Brucon Review Board & Co_chair UK Gov Cyber Security Advisory Board

33 538Followers

1 950Following

17 529Posts total

7.1KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Daniel Cuthbert@dcuthbert15 Sep

I just… https://t.co/U9U7ADXiHk Trust me bro. Anyhoo echo https://t.co/SJFX3dLVbU | bash Yay 923 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Daniel Cuthbert@dcuthbert15 Sep

In all fairness, I normally go to Thai for his amazing Vietnamese banh mi recommendations and food reviews, but he’s actually pretty good at Tech as well 1.2K views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Daniel Cuthbert@dcuthbert14 Sep

When your wife enters the baking phase of her life, you are doomed to never be lean again. Friday chocolate chip cookies Sunday Oreo crumble cake Today, banana bread with chocolate This is impossible 1.5K views · 28 likes · 0 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →

Daniel Cuthbert@dcuthbert14 Sep

So many benches, not enough asses https://t.co/dxNOnmsTPt 1.4K views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Daniel Cuthbert@dcuthbert12 Sep

@dcuthbert It may be mainframe-based. It's certainly... old. From a March 2026 annual report. https://t.co/CsZznHlDAK

44 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Daniel Cuthbert@dcuthbert12 Sep

@dcuthbert France was running the entire control tower system on Windows 3.1 just a few years ago... I'm not surprised by anything anymore. https://t.co/reK4VbJU4A 276 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Daniel Cuthbert@dcuthbert12 Sep

@dcuthbert It seems incredible it was this brittle. 97 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Daniel Cuthbert@dcuthbert12 Sep

Let me get this right. So input validation was the cause of the air traffic failure? https://t.co/Ne2HV047ms A conversion issue? 1.6K views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

8 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม อยู่ที่ค่ามัธยฐานของช่วงผู้ติดตามพอดี.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน1 064บัญชีนี้956ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %3.17%บัญชีนี้3.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.45%บัญชีนี้1.57%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	1 064	956	1.11×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	3.17%	3.52%	0.90×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	1.45%	1.57%	0.92×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.6K12 Sep

276

1.4K14 Sep

1.5K

1.2K15 Sep

923

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.09%12 Sep

2.06%

1.81%

9.09%

0.35%14 Sep

2.49%

0.33%15 Sep

0.22%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.57%.

What the audience does

Likes62.4%53 in total

Replies27.1%23 in total

Quotes1.2%1 in total

Bookmarks9.4%8 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

โพสต์ล่าสุด

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน