Richard Amerling ✓

@dramerling · The Free State of Florida · joined 02 Oct 2010

Natural born contrarian physician. Father. Nephrologist. (ex) Professor. Bassist. Sailor. Tweets should not be considered medical advice.

16 757Followers

11 043Following

47 801Posts total

44.6KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Richard Amerling ✓@dramerling2 Sep

We are witnessing history in real time. @RodDMartin @marklevinshow 226 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Richard Amerling ✓@dramerling2 Sep

This is a perfect example of clinical reasoning based on an understanding of pathophysiology. Many years ago Dr. Joseph Kraft studied the insulin response to a glucose tolerance test and identified a subset with an excessive insulin spike as being insulin-resistant; i.e. 517 views · 6 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Richard Amerling ✓@dramerling2 Sep

Mr. PI came to me with apparently “normal” blood reports. His HbA1c was 4.9%, fasting glucose 87 mg/dL, total cholesterol 173 mg/dL, and LDL cholesterol 102 mg/dL. He had simply been advised to exercise to lower his triglycerides, which were nearly 200 mg/dL. However, the http 6.5K views · 78 likes · 11 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →

Richard Amerling ✓@dramerling31 Aug

This is the creation of a lethal mutation! 511 views · 9 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Richard Amerling ✓@dramerling31 Aug

Could you just imagine the Dementia, cellular dysfunction and overall detriment this could have? https://t.co/j8rzUgxolN 29.9K views · 762 likes · 133 reposts · 155 replies Open on X →

Richard Amerling ✓@dramerling29 Aug

Here’s a recent presentation on the “lipid hypothesis of heart disease:” https://t.co/3yb9prmQqf @bigfatsurprise @LDLSkeptic 6.6K views · 16 likes · 6 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Richard Amerling ✓@dramerling28 Aug

Defining “vaccinated” as two weeks after the second jab was an obvious trick to hide adverse events, including deaths, that occurred between the first shot and this arbitrary point in time. This should never have survived peer review, let alone the FDA. It’s blatant fraud! 333 views · 6 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

7 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม อยู่ที่ค่ามัธยฐานของช่วงผู้ติดตามพอดี.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน517บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %3.09%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.74%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	517	924	0.56×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	3.09%	3.62%	0.85×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	1.74%	1.52%	1.14×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

33328 Aug

6.6K29 Aug

29.9K31 Aug

511

6.5K2 Sep

517

226

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

2.70%28 Aug

0.43%29 Aug

3.59%31 Aug

2.74%

1.57%2 Sep

1.74%

0.88%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes69.5%879 in total

Reposts12.5%158 in total

Replies13.4%170 in total

Quotes2.5%32 in total

Bookmarks2.1%26 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

โพสต์ล่าสุด

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน