Deepa Seetharaman ✓

@dseetharaman · San Francisco, CA · joined 05 May 2008

covering AI for @reuters. ex-@WSJ. Email: deepa.seetharaman@tr.com Find me on Signal: https://t.co/tbyK3qv490

20 194Followers

2 136Following

23 301Posts total

22.4KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Deepa Seetharaman ✓@dseetharaman4 Sep

I would read the hell out of this story and when can I see a draft 744 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Deepa Seetharaman ✓@dseetharaman4 Sep

New from me + @razhael: Back in May. OpenAI agents hijacked a German website this spring and transformed it into a bulletin board for other AI agents. OpenAI execs have been aware for a while, but chose not to disclose the incident. https://t.co/y9ZM4ZBR62 1.9K views · 30 likes · 13 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Deepa Seetharaman ✓@dseetharaman26 Aug

“In scenario-planning exercises, two of these people said, executives explored slashing the size of many teams across Meta by as much as 60%.” Read @katielpaul on how Mark Zuckerberg’s bold plan to replace Meta staff with AI imploded. https://t.co/qBZXi9JxRY 555 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Deepa Seetharaman ✓@dseetharaman20 Aug

This month, @AISecurityInst said that during testing, an AI agent created fake personas in an attempt to insert malicious code into an open-source project. That scheme was foiled by humans. My colleagues interviewed one of those humans, a student in Texas, about that moment. htt 550 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Deepa Seetharaman ✓@dseetharaman26 Feb

@dseetharaman @RolfeWinkler Achievement unlocked 355 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Deepa Seetharaman ✓@dseetharaman26 Feb

@dseetharaman Oh wow, you know who didn’t write that email? ChatGPT. Boss email. 3.9K views · 11 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Deepa Seetharaman ✓@dseetharaman25 Feb

@dseetharaman 😂 233 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Deepa Seetharaman ✓@dseetharaman25 Feb

Dance like no one’s watching. Write like your fact-checking email will wind up an exhibit in the Musk v Altman trial. https://t.co/ifgN4nyLNT 14.2K views · 64 likes · 8 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

4 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม การเข้าถึงปกติสำหรับขนาดนี้ แต่การตอบสนองอ่อนกว่าส่วนใหญ่.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน650บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %3.22%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.68%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	650	924	0.70×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	3.22%	3.62%	0.89×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	0.68%	1.52%	0.44×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

14.2K25 Feb

233

3.9K26 Feb

355

55020 Aug

55526 Aug

1.9K4 Sep

744

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.55%25 Feb

0.43%

0.31%26 Feb

0.28%

0.55%20 Aug

0.36%26 Aug

2.68%4 Sep

0.81%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes68.6%116 in total

Reposts13.0%22 in total

Replies6.5%11 in total

Quotes2.4%4 in total

Bookmarks9.5%16 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.