tweetindex
TH

International Fact-Checking Network

@factchecknet · 🌎 🌍 🌏 · joined 26 Sep 2015

International Fact-Checking Network at @Poynter brings together fact-checkers worldwide.

46 779Followers
278Following
11 296Posts total
44.4KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

@factchecknet https://t.co/eINMSYUht2 11 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
#GabrielAttal @libe @FRANCE24 @BFMTV https://t.co/VaO6pHDFrp
0:16
0:14
0:12
40.4K views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Journalist Alaa Salman has died of injuries after an Israeli airstrike destroyed her home; her death was marked with a moment of silence at GlobalFact. Read more about Alaa and her work with Sawab, and join us in mourning her loss: https://t.co/bihnKTu6Qg 1.4K views · 12 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
To have #GlobalFact2026 in Lithuania was “a huge milestone,” representing a landmark moment for some Baltic fact-checkers and a region that has, for years, found itself on the front lines of information warfare between east and west. https://t.co/lBeuNTQRO6 776 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
What to do with AI? That was one of the major themes during GlobalFact 2026. It can be a savior for workflow. It can be an obstacle to uncovering the truth. But one way or another, it is affecting much of the universe fact-checkers inhabit. https://t.co/u6vqKGrbL4 917 views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
How are fact-checkers showing up on social video? Fact-checkers from India, the United States and Poland showcased videos that debunk scams, explain immigration policy and challenge politicians at #GlobalFact2026 436 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
The solution to investigating Russian influence? New tactics, and yes: Fact-checking and investigative journalism. Russia wants to steal the narrative. Finnish researcher and meme-er @P_Kallioniemi says fact-checkers and journalists have to take the initiative back. https://t.c
1:35
419 views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

2 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม แสดงในวงกว้าง แต่มีผู้ชมตอบสนองน้อย.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน20 208บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การเข้าถึง, %43.20%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.02%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100Kอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์20 20892421.9×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)43.20%3.62%11.9×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม0.02%1.52%0.01×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

41918 Jun
43619 Jun
91722 Jun
776
1.4K25 Jun
40.4K13 Aug
11

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.95%18 Jun
0.46%19 Jun
0.65%22 Jun
0.26%
1.19%25 Jun
0.04%13 Aug
0.00%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes66.7%38 in total
Reposts14.0%8 in total
Replies1.8%1 in total
Quotes3.5%2 in total
Bookmarks14.0%8 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน