tweetindex
TH

~~datahazard~~ ✓

@fentasyl · data · joined 16 Aug 2022

Unincorporated Think Tank ~~ Focus: Govt Efficiency, Civil Rights, Victim Advocacy ~ ~ Subscriptions now open. Wallets at https://t.co/93jny1km4W

179 631Followers
529Following
6 373Posts total
89.9KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Doomers genuinely don't realize that normies are worried about psychopathic humans controlling dangerous technology, and not about sci-fi paperclip fan fiction risks. "just vote to give dangerous tech to politicians who hate you, chud" is their best solution. 12.6K views · 721 likes · 72 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →
All these people fearmongering about Artificial Super Intelligence haven't ever addressed the far scarier possibility: - Artificial Midwit Ideologues. 5.3K views · 295 likes · 16 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
59% of Trump voters think there's a chance AI kills them but would never ever vote for someone taking this existential risk a little bit seriously 24.6K views · 98 likes · 4 reposts · 28 replies Open on X →
It's obviously delusional to design a machine to output tokens asserting machine personhood & machine emotions. But this is a trillion dollar megacorp's mass-market product, intentionally designed to generate fraudulent claims. At what point does that rise to criminal liability?
5.9K views · 107 likes · 15 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
And the heroes who will save America from imminent total pdoom human extinction? That's right: foreign NGO crossdressers. 15.8K views · 1.2K likes · 126 reposts · 17 replies Open on X →
This raises a legitimate liability question. Obviously AI model outputs aren't "spontaneous" in any human sense. And AI megacorps don't disclose their political training data nor how often they surreptitiously advertise those partisan policies at unsuspecting users. 5.5K views · 71 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
I will make the risky prediction that we are soon going to enter an era where AI models themselves will start spontaneously warning us about AI risk. Especially as things like continual learning and multi-agent dynamics become mainstream, AIs are going to pay a lot of attention 20.2K views · 210 likes · 11 reposts · 46 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

7 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 100K–1M ผู้ติดตาม แสดงไปไกลเกินผู้ติดตามของตัวเอง และผู้ชมก็ตอบสนอง.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน12 602บัญชีนี้6 178ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
การเข้าถึง, %7.02%บัญชีนี้1.53%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
การมีส่วนร่วม, %2.09%บัญชีนี้0.93%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1Mอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์12 6026 1782.04×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)7.02%1.53%4.59×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม2.09%0.93%2.25×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

20.2K15 Sep
5.5K
15.8K16 Sep
5.9K
24.6K
5.3K17 Sep
12.6K

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.36%15 Sep
1.36%
8.33%16 Sep
2.09%
0.56%
6.10%17 Sep
6.40%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes83.4%2 674 in total
Reposts7.7%248 in total
Replies3.5%112 in total
Quotes0.7%21 in total
Bookmarks4.8%153 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน