tweetindex
TH

Jon Schleuss

@gaufre · Washington, DC · joined 22 Jan 2008

President @newsguild. VP @CWAUnion. Past: @latimes data/graphics/coding journalist. Every worker should build a union. he/him ✊🏳️‍🌈

10 439Followers
10 383Following
26 958Posts total
56.1KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

The 41% needs to be verified. McClatchy execs decided to push AI slop on news sites. You can’t pivot to AI, cut 40% of your local journalists and write “we remain deeply committed to local journalism.” You’re lying. 23.8K views · 219 likes · 60 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
Cutting staff and pivoting more to AI isn’t going to help gain trust and build readership. Shameful behavior from a rudderless company. 1.3K views · 18 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Our Denver local has been organizing like crazy these last few years. Join them and keep it going! 693 views · 8 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Our Denver local is hiring a full-time organizer. This person will support new workers form unions and guide them through the entire process up to a signed collective agreement. Apply here! https://t.co/n3rUNzav4Y 1K views · 5 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Just got to meet two of the seven journalists who formed a union at the Centre Daily Times in State College, Pa.!! They’re joining the @PhillyNewsGuild and will bargain for common sense AI guardrails to protect their local newsroom! @TreborMaitin https://t.co/l8wuAK8ZmZ
Photo of three men standing together. Trebor Maitin, Josh Moyer and Jon Schleuss
2.7K views · 33 likes · 4 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Now NYT management needs to agree to common sense AI guardrails with @NYTimesGuild 4K views · 12 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
“To be clear on AI: All writing and visuals that freelancers submit to The Times must be the product of human creativity and craft, and all submissions must consist solely of their original reporting, writing and other work” The age of the AI backlash has arrived. 22.6K views · 537 likes · 100 reposts · 28 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

2 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม แสดงต่อคนมากกว่าบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน12 548บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การเข้าถึง, %120.21%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.39%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100Kอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์12 54892413.6×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)120.21%3.62%33.2×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม1.39%1.52%0.91×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

22.6K13 May
4K14 May
2.7K15 May
1K20 May
69321 May
1.3K3 Sep
23.8K10 Sep

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

2.97%13 May
0.40%14 May
1.44%15 May
0.88%20 May
1.59%21 May
1.57%3 Sep
1.21%10 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes74.4%832 in total
Reposts15.6%174 in total
Replies3.6%40 in total
Quotes0.7%8 in total
Bookmarks5.7%64 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน