tweetindex
TH

Ken Pomeroy

@kenpomeroy · Salt Lake City, UT · joined 25 Jan 2010

https://t.co/JsCXkq1i8L - https://t.co/Kr8X18WdOr - @forecastfactory - @kenpomgolf

184 733Followers
480Following
17 080Posts total
1.1MViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

John just calls it a blog, but the kids need to know that 20 years ago he spawned a whole generation of smarter Big Ten fans (which years later, continues to fuel my subscription numbers). Amazing times. https://t.co/ZlfYU4A0IN 151.9K views · 73 likes · 2 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
Hello, I have news! https://t.co/DJ05ZEA4O5
217.6K views · 159 likes · 8 reposts · 35 replies Open on X →
Congrats to Jordan who is one of most responsible and entertaining users of analytics in the field. Well deserved and a great add for Jans. 86.4K views · 73 likes · 1 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
In '92, 5-9 Iowa State got in. There is some nostalgic idea that only the best P6 teams used to get in. But it's not true. Mediocre P6 teams got in, there were just fewer of them available so plenty of room for the best MM at-larges. That is no longer the case. Need to expand. 68.1K views · 33 likes · 3 reposts · 14 replies Open on X →
@kenpomeroy https://t.co/2GiG7suxUG A look at 1991 for example. 56 power conference teams. 30 got in the field. Three with below-.500 records. By comparison, I believe there were 79 power conference teams of which 35 made the field and two were sub-.500. 69.6K views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Access has improved for P5 teams as a whole because there are more of them. Creighton, Butler, Houston, BYU are now P5. It hasn't changed for individual teams. 16-12 Kentucky made the '85 tourney. 18-13 (6-8) Maryland was a 5-seed(!) in 86. 17-12 (6-8) Maryland was a 7 in '88 66.5K views · 36 likes · 3 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
The heart of the issue is "access" for high-major programs, which is also misleading. Between conference expansion, reduction of non-con road games and metrics working in their favor, it's just as inclusive now for power-conf teams as it's ever been. I think Ken would agree. 77.1K views · 24 likes · 2 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@kenpomeroy @FightMA247 Top 100 Kenpom/NET get in to NCAA / NIT. Simple. 759 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@kenpomeroy And that rating system in hockey is widely panned because it’s basically rpi 2.2K views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@kenpomeroy Ultimate frisbee also allocates bids to its tourney via formula. Top 20 teams earn bids for their region with each region guaranteed a bid then have a tournament to see who gets those bids. With 100s of teams, it solves the not everyone plays another prob https://t.c 1.8K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The field for the NCAA hockey tournament was announced on Sunday and it was totally determined by a rating system. Amazing concept! And sad that basketball refuses to consider it. https://t.co/MUNhAbB5YK https://t.co/kmA6Cn6aHV
358.9K views · 586 likes · 49 reposts · 38 replies Open on X →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

358.9K25 Mar
1.8K
2.2K
759
77.1K20 Jun
66.5K
69.6K
68.1K
86.4K26 Jun
217.6K29 Aug
151.9K

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.19%25 Mar
0.38%
0.18%
0.40%
0.04%20 Jun
0.07%
0.00%
0.07%
0.09%26 Jun
0.10%29 Aug
0.06%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views.

What the audience does

Likes79.6%997 in total
Reposts5.4%68 in total
Replies8.8%110 in total
Quotes2.6%32 in total
Bookmarks3.6%45 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน