tweetindex
TH

Lawrence Hurley

@lawrencehurley · Washington, D.C. · joined 08 Apr 2009

Senior Supreme Court Reporter @NBCNews; Signal: lawrencehurley.25

38 401Followers
697Following
46 665Posts total
26.2KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Massachusetts v EPA, in which the Supreme Court said greenhouse gases are pollutants that could potentially be regulated under the Clean Air Act, remains on the books. 1.1K views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Thank you, @epaleezeldin, for clarifying on @Varneyco that EPA’s regulatory rollback is related to emissions, NOT pollution. “What we’re talking about here are emissions like carbon dioxide, in what was an attempt by the Obama-Biden Administrations to shut down plants across the
2:19
1.3K views · 6 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/fB4GbUrn1p https://t.co/7OphFgokWz
822 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
What grounds are there for this to be an expedited appeal? 1.1K views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
NEW: In recent election decisions, the Supreme Court has ruled against Trump & GOP, signaling a majority of justices are not receptive to more extreme efforts to disrupt elections as the midterms approach 👇 https://t.co/b4vs3uU781
832 views · 3 likes · 7 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@lawrencehurley The NBC report on this decision shows clearly how NBC and other “ fake news” outlets subtly reveal their biases: Note how they refer to the whole “ Trump Russia collusion” hoax WITHOUT their usual qualifier for uncertainty of allegations-like “ alleged”! Making 10 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@lawrencehurley Just reading your article about the congressman wanting to impeach Judges Boasberg and Broadman. The judges they should be impeaching or the conservative justices on the supreme Court who shielded Donald Trump and ruled unconstitutionally regarding presidential i 31 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@lawrencehurley Parents- keep your kids away from Larry's 'confidential Signal' 20 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
If you need to contact me confidentially, you can reach me via Signal: lawrencehurley.25 https://t.co/9Pnwvlumjd
21K views · 30 likes · 4 reposts · 20 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

5 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม การเข้าถึงปกติสำหรับขนาดนี้ แต่การตอบสนองอ่อนกว่าส่วนใหญ่.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน1 110บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การเข้าถึง, %2.89%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.72%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100Kอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์1 1109241.20×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)2.89%3.62%0.80×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม0.72%1.52%0.47×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

21K1 Feb
2027 Sep
318 Jan
1015 Jun
83215 Sep
1.1K
82216 Sep
1.3K
1.1K

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.27%1 Feb
20.00%27 Sep
3.23%8 Jan
10.00%15 Jun
1.32%15 Sep
0.52%
0.12%16 Sep
0.80%
0.72%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes52.8%56 in total
Reposts14.2%15 in total
Replies21.7%23 in total
Quotes4.7%5 in total
Bookmarks6.6%7 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน