Microsoft Security

@msftsecurity · Redmond, WA · joined 26 Oct 2010

Be first to know about AI, threats, and new tools. Quick hits, expert tips, and real-time security news—follow for smarter, safer ops.

344 058Followers

320Following

23 043Posts total

127KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Microsoft Security@msftsecurity3 Sep

The question is no longer *if* you'll adopt AI agents. It's whether your security strategy is ready. Not sure? Get our playbook for securing AI and find out. Link: https://t.co/83mRaJWUMQ 9.9K views · 42 likes · 10 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Microsoft Security@msftsecurity31 Aug

Your agents can act, decide, and pull data without asking. The question isn't whether that's useful. It's whether anyone can see all of them. Our Discovery Session covers finding every agent you've got and governing what it can reach. Reserve your spot: https://t.co/oH1kT9BnK

0:27

5.5K views · 17 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Microsoft Security@msftsecurity29 Aug

@msftsecurity Five times more throughput matters only if precision, recall, queue age and false-positive cost remain visible. Faster labeling can protect Copilot rollouts, but silent over-labeling and missed sensitive data are operational failures too. 25 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Microsoft Security@msftsecurity28 Aug

@msftsecurity This is a useful update. AI rollouts can move fast, so having the protection layer catch up instead of slowing everything down makes a real difference. 71 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Microsoft Security@msftsecurity27 Aug

Microsoft Purview auto-labeling went from 100,000 files a day to 500,000. If your Copilot rollout was waiting on data protection to catch up, it caught up. That's one update. More here: https://t.co/7kVmRLiE6F https://t.co/lcguWG8hfx

GIF

15.4K views · 93 likes · 23 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

Microsoft Security@msftsecurity26 Aug

Safe Links, Safe Attachments, anti-phishing policies. The unglamorous stuff that decides how your week goes. Scott Landry shows how to remediate threats and strengthen defenses using Microsoft Defender. On demand, one hour. Watch now: https://t.co/WGLjrNZRqf https://t.co/YPQJ

8.5K views · 40 likes · 13 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Microsoft Security@msftsecurity17 May

@msftsecurity This is exactly the direction security platforms are moving toward: graph-based context, AI-ready infrastructure, and agentic security workflows. https://t.co/NF1mUbX15o But as defenders begin using autonomous or semi-autonomous security agents, the next challenge 124 views · 4 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Microsoft Security@msftsecurity19 Dec 2025

@msftsecurity I have just lost a complaint to ACCC pic 3 that your company stole my money. I am going to lodge a complaint now to cancel my order because your company are scam frauds. https://t.co/DKpLzz7RZ9

332 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →

Microsoft Security@msftsecurity1 Oct 2025

@msftsecurity AI-powered security agents = game changer 🔥👀 #CyberSecurity #AI” 197 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Microsoft Security@msftsecurity30 Sep 2025

From graph-based context to build-your-own Microsoft Security Copilot agents, we're introducing a new AI-ready security platform and innovations to empower defenders in the era of agentic AI: https://t.co/4jLkI7SxI7 #MSSecure https://t.co/M4QwS93p93

0:05

86.9K views · 144 likes · 39 reposts · 45 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

6 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 100K–1M ผู้ติดตาม การเข้าถึงปกติสำหรับขนาดนี้ แต่การตอบสนองอ่อนกว่าส่วนใหญ่.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน6 986บัญชีนี้6 224ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M

การเข้าถึง, %2.03%บัญชีนี้1.93%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M

การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.71%บัญชีนี้1.15%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	6 986	6 224	1.12×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	2.03%	1.93%	1.05×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	0.71%	1.15%	0.62×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

86.9K30 Sep

1971 Oct

33219 Dec

12417 May

8.5K26 Aug

15.4K27 Aug

7128 Aug

2529 Aug

5.5K31 Aug

9.9K3 Sep

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.26%30 Sep

2.03%1 Oct

5.12%19 Dec

4.84%17 May

0.64%26 Aug

0.79%27 Aug

2.82%28 Aug

4.00%29 Aug

0.40%31 Aug

0.54%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.15%.

What the audience does

Likes48.1%345 in total

Reposts12.7%91 in total

Replies10.3%74 in total

Bookmarks28.9%207 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.