Jash Dholani ✓

@oldbooksguy · The case against AI art👉 · joined 28 Dec 2018

Follow for new ideas from old books Here's my curation of 600+ bangers from old books: https://t.co/cIJcbY9mhc

108 697Followers

6 326Following

26 940Posts total

1.3MViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Jash Dholani ✓@oldbooksguy11 Sep

@oldbooksguy @AbigailShrier Gen Z leftist women are arguably the worst generation of women who have ever lived. They are the most spoiled, coddled, entitled, hedonistic, selfish, misandrist, self-destructive, and un-feminine women on the planet. A colossal market correction is co 18K views · 798 likes · 13 reposts · 13 replies Open on X →

Jash Dholani ✓@oldbooksguy10 Sep

@oldbooksguy @AbigailShrier It’s not the women’s fault. There’s only so many 6 foot 4 millionaire bodybuilders with PhDs who are also secret vampires or werewolves. We wouldn’t want them to lower their standards, right? 18.4K views · 1.8K likes · 32 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

Jash Dholani ✓@oldbooksguy10 Sep

@oldbooksguy @AbigailShrier Wait till you realize when you interview for a job you’re being interviewed by a woman. You’re cooked if you’re ugly. 11.2K views · 629 likes · 6 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Jash Dholani ✓@oldbooksguy10 Sep

Wow, this book will definitely kick up a storm when it releases https://t.co/iKwa1kHb8L

824K views · 7.6K likes · 482 reposts · 91 replies Open on X →

Jash Dholani ✓@oldbooksguy4 Sep

@oldbooksguy This is incorrect. The data show that very wealthy people have lots of kids, suggesting that motherhood is so high status it’s out of reach for almost everyone. Extremely poor people, like mud hut dwellers, also have lots of kids…but that’s just because they don’t u 1.5K views · 19 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Jash Dholani ✓@oldbooksguy4 Sep

@oldbooksguy A 4K+ word mansplain obviating the main reason why women fear motherhood: they’re afraid of being trapped. Nearly every measure the author suggests is an attempt at curtailing women’s freedom. None discuss what men can do differently to help. 1.5K views · 35 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Jash Dholani ✓@oldbooksguy4 Sep

@oldbooksguy Really? SNL did a skit on it years ago about how nobody respects stay home moms. In capitalism only value that’s is measured is $$$. And unless you are mom of billionaire or wife of billionaire nobody respects you. Your proximity to money/power is only that matters. 1.2K views · 12 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Jash Dholani ✓@oldbooksguy4 Sep

"A society that punishes its excellent, actually punishes everyone" 12.4K views · 329 likes · 29 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Jash Dholani ✓@oldbooksguy4 Sep

this essay has the best explanation i've ever heard for the global collapse in fertility rates 285.3K views · 1.9K likes · 179 reposts · 36 replies Open on X →

Jash Dholani ✓@oldbooksguy4 Sep

backrooms is so resonant because it tries to lift the veil off of everyday reality and peek into the "backrooms" of the world - to locate the background processes that are rendering everything...and the horror is that there is no solid foundation, just degraded copies of copies.. 2.7K views · 16 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Jash Dholani ✓@oldbooksguy4 Sep

Serious question What do the hyper-productive know that most people don't? https://t.co/5HZckgmM9S 88.4K views · 1.4K likes · 57 reposts · 104 replies Open on X →

Jash Dholani ✓@oldbooksguy3 Aug

Nietzsche didn't kill God. Nietzsche saved God in the only way he could have been saved. This is why it's always the religious believers who love reading, re-reading, and discussing Nietzsche. Let me tell you what I mean. Nietzsche realized early that the modern man was high 66.8K views · 402 likes · 41 reposts · 47 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

12 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 100K–1M ผู้ติดตาม แสดงไปไกลเกินผู้ติดตามของตัวเอง และผู้ชมก็ตอบสนอง.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน15 248บัญชีนี้5 983ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M

การเข้าถึง, %14.03%บัญชีนี้1.49%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M

การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.61%บัญชีนี้0.93%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	15 248	5 983	2.55×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	14.03%	1.49%	9.41×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	1.61%	0.93%	1.73×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

66.8K3 Aug

88.4K4 Sep

2.7K

285.3K

12.4K

1.2K

1.5K

824K10 Sep

11.2K

18.4K

18K11 Sep

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.76%3 Aug

1.76%4 Sep

0.60%

0.74%

2.89%

0.99%

2.32%

1.46%

0.99%10 Sep

5.69%

9.74%

4.57%11 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes69.2%14 815 in total

Reposts3.9%840 in total

Replies1.4%306 in total

Quotes0.2%48 in total

Bookmarks25.2%5 402 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

โพสต์ล่าสุด

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน