Pavel Ibarra Meda ✓

@pavelibarrameda

Journo. Media analyst. News Breaker. Host of @PsicoactivoPod former #PsychedelicExperiencer & former Contributor @ #DownToEarth My tweets, my views. 👽🛸

8 492Followers

4 875Following

15 088Posts total

23.2KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Pavel Ibarra Meda ✓@pavelibarrameda1 Sep

@pavelibarrameda @Wheres_Gino I’m nearly certain most people who claim “psionic” or “ce5” simply aren’t familiar with what new (2018) satellite technology has entered the earth’s orbit; Because low-earth orbit satellites are substantially more visually captivating than the satell 138 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Pavel Ibarra Meda ✓@pavelibarrameda31 Aug

@pavelibarrameda @Wheres_Gino Psionics aren’t new they have been D&D cannon since supplement 3 in 1976. Y’all just late to the party. 47 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Pavel Ibarra Meda ✓@pavelibarrameda31 Aug

@pavelibarrameda @Wheres_Gino Nerds have known about psionics since the advent of Dungeons & Dragons. 61 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Pavel Ibarra Meda ✓@pavelibarrameda31 Aug

I’m going to give an answer to the question I asked yesterday in the QT below… “When did it become a ‘common thing’ for people to say they can summon orbs?” The answer is that it has become increasingly common starting in 2018 when 2 things increased DRAMATICALLY: 1. The https:

0:39

5.4K views · 39 likes · 9 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

Pavel Ibarra Meda ✓@pavelibarrameda31 Aug

Just to be clear, one thing is this new term, Psionics. And another very different thing is ESP. I think plenty of folks confuse the two, and that shouldn't be so. I support this from @Wheres_Gino, I would love to see some proof of Psionics as well. If you want scientific proof 4.5K views · 39 likes · 4 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →

Pavel Ibarra Meda ✓@pavelibarrameda31 Aug

Gino, producer for The Why Files, (@Wheres_Gino) has put out an open invite to anyone who can demonstrate psionic abilities. He’ll help document it properly, with a chance to appear on The Why Files and potentially get it in front of Joe Rogan and others. 👀 https://t.co/3FdTbQf

2:53

13K views · 157 likes · 27 reposts · 49 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

6 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง under 10K ผู้ติดตาม เข้าถึงคนน้อยกว่าบัญชีรุ่นเดียวกัน แต่ดึงการมีส่วนร่วมได้แรงกว่ามาก.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน2 306บัญชีนี้4 175ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K

การเข้าถึง, %27.15%บัญชีนี้250.82%ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.98%บัญชีนี้1.41%ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ under 10K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	2 306	4 175	0.55×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	27.15%	2.5× audience	0.11×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	1.98%	1.41%	1.41×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

13K31 Aug

4.5K

5.4K

1381 Sep

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.79%31 Aug

1.30%

1.00%

6.56%

8.51%

2.17%1 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.41%.

What the audience does

Likes68.7%246 in total

Reposts11.2%40 in total

Replies19.6%70 in total

Bookmarks0.6%2 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

โพสต์ล่าสุด

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน