tweetindex
TH

Pedro Domingos

@pmddomingos · Seattle, WA · joined 07 Jul 2015

Professor of computer science at UW and author of '2040' and 'The Master Algorithm'. Into machine learning, AI, and anything that makes me curious.

133 713Followers
178Following
26 718Posts total
983.7KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

@pmddomingos Thanks for letting know, I’ve been trying to create an infinite vortex in my teacup for an hour now 1.1K views · 16 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@pmddomingos And here I was worried about my water faucet exploding 2.1K views · 43 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@pmddomingos And because of the sound speed. Fluids with higher velocity stop being incompressible 576 views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
BTW, in the real world fluids can't accelerate to infinite speeds because of special relativity. 46K views · 594 likes · 28 reposts · 56 replies Open on X →
@pmddomingos I think it's simpler than that: acceleration is linear in force, but it doesn't mean that the resulting motion can't be nonlinear. 4K views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
A: Because in Navier-Stokes the velocity is not the velocity of a particle, but the velocity at a point. The particle at a point keeps changing, and the faster the motion, the faster it changes, making the acceleration quadratic. Without this there'd be no turbulence. (2/2) 12.9K views · 179 likes · 4 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
Q: Navier-Stokes is just Newton's laws for fluids, and Newton's laws are linear, so why is Navier-Stokes nonlinear? (1/2) 74K views · 328 likes · 26 reposts · 19 replies Open on X →
AlphaGo did not beat Lee Sedol. The humans who built AlphaGo beat Lee Sedol. 4.2K views · 48 likes · 5 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
Resist the delusional/dishonest attempt by OpenAI and Anthropic to redefine AGI as what they've already done. 6.7K views · 196 likes · 26 reposts · 20 replies Open on X →
And meanwhile LLMs still can't add two numbers of arbitrary length. 10.2K views · 132 likes · 8 reposts · 27 replies Open on X →
Slides from the @ECMLPKDD 2025 opening keynote: https://t.co/hQaSaxJeZP 9.1K views · 20 likes · 3 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@pmddomingos @pmddomingos where is the compiler/interpreter, system libs, an examples repo? 10.1K views · 26 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I've found the path to AGI: https://t.co/NRvZViBVUc 802.9K views · 2.1K likes · 258 reposts · 205 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

10 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 100K–1M ผู้ติดตาม แสดงไปไกลเกินผู้ติดตามของตัวเอง และผู้ชมก็ตอบสนอง.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน5 433บัญชีนี้5 906ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
การเข้าถึง, %4.06%บัญชีนี้1.59%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.53%บัญชีนี้1.04%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1M
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 100K–1Mอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์5 4335 9060.92×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)4.06%1.59%2.56×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม1.53%1.04%1.46×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

802.9K15 Oct
10.1K
9.1K22 Oct
10.2K9 Sep
6.7K
4.2K
74K
12.9K
4K
46K10 Sep
576
2.1K
1.1K

Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.32%15 Oct
0.27%
0.30%22 Oct
1.68%9 Sep
3.70%
1.62%
0.51%
1.48%
0.28%
1.47%10 Sep
1.56%
2.08%
1.49%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.04%.

What the audience does

Likes51.7%3 660 in total
Reposts5.1%358 in total
Replies5.0%351 in total
Quotes1.2%87 in total
Bookmarks37.1%2 630 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

9 Sep

Daily snapshots since 09 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน