Diana S. Fleischman ✓

@sentientist · joined 09 Mar 2012

I left academia so I can say whatever I want here now. Evolutionary psychologist. Mama. Married to @gmiller.

69 180Followers

1 055Following

20 111Posts total

2.3MViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Diana S. Fleischman ✓@sentientist11 Sep

I think it's virtuous when a man becomes a good and investing stepfather in children whose father doesn't care for them. I think it's virtuous when people foster or adopt children who have no one to care for them. And I think it's virtuous to care for your child's half sibling, 26.3K views · 266 likes · 9 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →

Diana S. Fleischman ✓@sentientist11 Sep

Black Americans generally endorse less punitive criminal justice policies than whites. But jury selection disproportionately filters out black people with a criminal record, difficulty serving without pay or who have moved frequently. This means black jurors tend to be more 31.8K views · 264 likes · 8 reposts · 17 replies Open on X →

Diana S. Fleischman ✓@sentientist10 Sep

“I don’t know if I feel like going out a ton or not.” Why impose decisions on others that you can most easily make yourself? Indecisive people give me the ick. 15.1K views · 121 likes · 0 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →

Diana S. Fleischman ✓@sentientist10 Sep

Single girlfriend in NYC’s text exchange with a Hinge match. If a woman tells you “I don’t know if I feel like going out,” that’s a sign to cut bait. “Lmk please” is so grim 😬 https://t.co/ZXL8ZpGbBo

2.2M views · 2.1K likes · 20 reposts · 525 replies Open on X →

Diana S. Fleischman ✓@sentientist8 Sep

The first sport where black people succeeded disproportionally was thoroughbred racing. In the late 1800s 15/28 of the first Derby winners were brought in by black jockeys. 14/15 of the jockeys in the first Kentucky Derby in 1875 were black. Why? One plausible explanation is ht

4.1K views · 56 likes · 3 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Diana S. Fleischman ✓@sentientist5 Sep

https://t.co/o1OKoCABs2

12.8K views · 321 likes · 15 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

6 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม แสดงในวงกว้าง แต่มีผู้ชมตอบสนองน้อย.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน20 721บัญชีนี้935ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %29.95%บัญชีนี้3.43%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.01%บัญชีนี้1.54%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	20 721	935	22.2×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	29.95%	3.43%	8.73×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	1.01%	1.54%	0.65×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

12.8K5 Sep

4.1K8 Sep

2.2M10 Sep

15.1K

31.8K11 Sep

26.3K

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

2.68%5 Sep

1.50%8 Sep

0.12%10 Sep

0.88%

0.91%11 Sep

1.10%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.54%.

What the audience does

Likes80.5%3 153 in total

Reposts1.4%55 in total

Replies14.8%578 in total

Bookmarks3.4%132 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.