tweetindex
TH

The Unbiased Science Podcast

@unbiasedscipod · joined 10 Jul 2020

NO NONSENSE, JUST SCIENCE. Dr. Jess Steier (Public Health Scientist)

10 001Followers
278Following
4 123Posts total
25.4KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Nobody changes their mind because of a viral post. People change their minds because someone they love sat with them and took the question seriously. Those conversations can be uncomfortable. Please have them anyway. https://t.co/zF6eW0jsLD 575 views · 9 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
This school year will be messy and it will bring its challenges, and we’ll get through it. Every phase they enter is one I am entering right alongside them, and we are all just doing our very best. https://t.co/jLNDAtpVpJ https://t.co/sMxXjAm04Y 273 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Yesterday's signing of an executive order on childhood vaccines was a demonstration reel of every technique we warn people about, delivered from the most powerful podium in the country. Let's discuss... https://t.co/ikA6DjZuyR https://t.co/IUKGc89Agf 274 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Thanks to Medpage for covering our new 'What's The Risk?' Tool. Please send us any feedback at vaccines@unbiasedscience.com! https://t.co/xV9Ya4T5xS 358 views · 1 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@unbiasedscipod What happens when "authoritative" sources contribute to the misinformation pool. What a mess! 96 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
It can be extremely difficult to parse out fact from fiction— and so our goal with Unbiased Science is to help you do so! Let us know how we can help! Read the study here: https://t.co/sNE9k6j9GV 2/2 715 views · 13 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
A large-scale study published in Science revealed concerning trends in the spread of misinformation online, particularly w/ science content. Research focusing on Twitter data from 2006-17 suggests that falsehoods travel significantly faster/wider than truthful information. 1/2 h 23.2K views · 147 likes · 49 reposts · 27 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

4 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม การเข้าถึงปกติสำหรับขนาดนี้ แต่การตอบสนองอ่อนกว่าส่วนใหญ่.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน316บัญชีนี้924ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การเข้าถึง, %3.16%บัญชีนี้3.62%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
การมีส่วนร่วม, %0.78%บัญชีนี้1.52%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K
ตัวชี้วัดบัญชีนี้ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100Kอัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์3169240.34×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)3.16%3.62%0.87×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม0.78%1.52%0.52×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ →   เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น →   ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

23.2K3 Feb
715
9614 Feb
3587 Aug
27411 Aug
27326 Aug
57528 Aug

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.98%3 Feb
2.38%
2.08%14 Feb
0.84%7 Aug
0.73%11 Aug
0.00%26 Aug
1.91%28 Aug

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes59.6%174 in total
Reposts19.2%56 in total
Replies9.6%28 in total
Quotes1.7%5 in total
Bookmarks9.9%29 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

บัญชีที่คล้ายกัน