Ziad Ali ✓

@ziadalinyc · New York, NY · joined 20 May 2016

Director, Cardiovascular Institute @StFrancis_LI @CHS_LI. Professor @NYIT. Clinical trialist @opcilive. Son, Brother, Husband, Dad everywhere.

12 517Followers

3 880Following

2 627Posts total

19.5KViews on collected posts

โพสต์ล่าสุด

Ziad Ali ✓@ziadalinyc28 Aug

Really? There was no increase in mortality in the RCT Early-TAVR. Why do you think the registry is more valid? 7.7K views · 23 likes · 5 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Ziad Ali ✓@ziadalinyc20 Aug

Not just an obstacle; calcified plaque is bad even with what follows. In ILUMIEN IV, calcific lesions carried twice the adjusted risk of 2-year TVF despite OCT-guided PCI. Better mechanics may not erase hostile biology. @GreggWStone @RickVolleberg @BURZOTTA_F @AbbottNews 4.1K views · 30 likes · 11 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Ziad Ali ✓@ziadalinyc8 Aug

Debunking debulking DUAL-PREP OCT by Sotomi and colleagues highlights one of the oldest assumptions in complex PCI. Atherectomy produces remarkably little visible calcium fracture and removes relatively little calcium. So what is its principal role if not debulking. Mechanical 7K views · 71 likes · 23 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Ziad Ali ✓@ziadalinyc11 Jun

https://t.co/qUV9swp3GH

626 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Ziad Ali ✓@ziadalinyc13 Oct 2021

Mini-tweetorial on Shockwave MOA 1\ 3 types of lithotripsy 1)Extracorporeal (ESWL) – break kidney stones from the outside 2)Intracorpoeal (ISWL) – break kidney stones from the inside 3)Intravascular (IVL) – fracture calcium in the vasculature from the inside 0 views · 288 likes · 85 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →

เทียบกับบัญชีขนาดเดียวกัน

3 โพสต์จาก 90 วันที่ผ่านมา เทียบกับช่วง 10K–100K ผู้ติดตาม แสดงในวงกว้าง แต่มีผู้ชมตอบสนองน้อย.

ยอดดูมัธยฐาน7 042บัญชีนี้936ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การเข้าถึง, %56.26%บัญชีนี้3.43%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

การมีส่วนร่วม, %1.02%บัญชีนี้1.55%ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K

ตัวชี้วัด	บัญชีนี้	ค่ามัธยฐานของ 10K–100K	อัตราส่วน
ยอดดูมัธยฐานต่อโพสต์	7 042	936	7.52×
การเข้าถึง (ยอดดู ÷ ผู้ติดตาม)	56.26%	3.43%	16.4×
อัตราการมีส่วนร่วม	1.02%	1.55%	0.66×

บัญชีอื่นในช่วงนี้ → เปรียบเทียบกับบัญชีอื่น → ค่าอ้างอิงเหล่านี้คำนวณอย่างไร →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

62611 Jun

7K8 Aug

4.1K20 Aug

7.7K28 Aug

Last 4 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.12%11 Jun

1.33%8 Aug

1.02%20 Aug

0.43%28 Aug

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.55%.

What the audience does

Likes55.0%131 in total

Reposts16.4%39 in total

Replies2.5%6 in total

Bookmarks26.1%62 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.