tweetindex
TR

Bitfinex'ed 🔥🐧 Κασσάνδρα 🏺 ✓

@Bitfinexed · 15kYzB3h8ASNoJf4NyVJ4X3ub5TzcMcgBW · joined 10 Apr 2017

Exposed Bitfinex/Tether as one the largest financial frauds in history. "A powerful force working to harm Tether." - Tether CEO - Ludovicus Jan van der Velde

109 810Followers
1 166Following
86 613Posts total
1.2MViews on collected posts

Son gönderiler

Imagine selling bitcoin and getting Tethers instead of dollars, and then the tethers turn out to be fraud proceeds. Your money is gone. When you could have just used, dollars. 3.7K views · 21 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Okay hear me out. A betting platform for relationships. 4.1K views · 20 likes · 0 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
Absolutely nothing to see here. https://t.co/0c8JRduMcR 17K views · 31 likes · 6 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Uh guys…. https://t.co/3upHqtA4eq 6.3K views · 35 likes · 2 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
Tether lawyers literally can't stop lying. https://t.co/pyudAmq9fr 15.2K views · 81 likes · 12 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
The New York Court, and Tethers other lawyers, also disagree with Jason Weinstein. They backed Tethers with volatile Bitcoins, instead of dollars. So who's telling the truth? The court: "There is no reserve." It's all commingled assets, just like the FTX fraud. https://t.co/nS 29K views · 136 likes · 29 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@Bitfinexed https://t.co/Ib3mfOEeL0 1.2K views · 14 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Tethers Lawyer: We paid an outside firm to produce forensic evidence showing that Tethers were fully backed all of the time and sent that to the CFTC. Crypto: Can we see it? Tether: No, we'd rather just endlessly go on cocaine benders & complain about FUD instead of ending FUD. 26.2K views · 171 likes · 22 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
Tethers lawyer Jason Weinstein claims that they produced forensic evidence showing that Tethers were fully backed every single day. That's strange. The CFTC said the exact opposite. How come Tether doesn't produce this forensic evidence for the public to see it, to end the FUD? 1.1M views · 964 likes · 223 reposts · 194 replies Open on X →

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Son 90 güne ait 4 gönderi, 100K–1M takipçi aralığıyla yan yana. geniş kitleye gösteriliyor, ama izleyenlerin azı tepki veriyor.

Medyan görüntülenme5 186bu hesap5 983100K–1M için medyan
Erişim, %4.72%bu hesap1.49%100K–1M için medyan
Etkileşim, %0.63%bu hesap0.93%100K–1M için medyan
ÖlçütBu hesap100K–1M için medyanOran
Gönderi başına medyan görüntülenme5 1865 9830.87×
Erişim (görüntülenme ÷ takipçi)4.72%1.49%3.17×
Etkileşim oranı0.63%0.93%0.68×

Bu aralıktaki diğer hesaplar →   Başka bir hesapla karşılaştır →   Bu kıyas değerleri nasıl kuruluyor →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.1M29 Dec
26.2K
1.2K
29K
15.2K31 Dec
6.3K18 Aug
17K20 Aug
4.1K27 Aug
3.7K3 Sep

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.13%29 Dec
0.77%
1.25%
0.60%
0.67%31 Dec
0.67%18 Aug
0.23%20 Aug
0.64%27 Aug
0.62%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes67.3%1 473 in total
Reposts13.5%295 in total
Replies10.2%224 in total
Quotes2.9%63 in total
Bookmarks6.1%133 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Benzer hesaplar