tweetindex
TR

ItsFrank

@FrankLambeek · joined 26 Jun 2009

Decentralization & financial freedom maximalist | Backing builders | No-KYC betting on @Dexsport | https://t.co/vp8BnvFl0p Threads + alpha daily | DM for collabs

55 169Followers
938Following
120 604Posts total
3.6KViews on collected posts

Son gönderiler

Fast L1s are not interchangeable. $SOL → one fast global state $SUI → objects and parallel execution $SEI → trading-first EVM $KAS → PoW that tries to stay fast $APT → Move, with a different execution path All “high performance.” Not the same machine. The takeaway: TPS 306 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Payments, RWA, AI, and gaming get dumped into one altcoin basket. They should not. 💳 Payments need rails people use. 🏦 RWA needs legal structure + on-chain access. 🤖 AI needs work that can be scored. 🎮 Gaming needs games, not just a token. $TEL $XRP $XLM $ONDO 470 views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
People keep talking about $SHIDO because it's built differently. One big reason is its architecture. $SHIDO is a Multi-VM Layer 1. Developers can build with EVM or WASM on the same network instead of splitting liquidity across two stacks. That means apps and assets can share 902 views · 38 likes · 13 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
People keep comparing Layer 1s like they are the product, but Layer 1s are not the same. Layer 1 is a category, not a product. Layer 1 is a group of chains that each have their purpose. $BTC → settlement $ETH → smart‑contract settlement $SOL → consumer throughput $SUI → 939 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
People keep talking about kaspa:native because it's built differently. One big reason is its architecture. uses proof of work with a BlockDAG and GHOSTDAG consensus. Blocks are not forced into one single line. Parallel blocks can exist at the same time and still get ordered. 995 views · 43 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Son 90 güne ait 5 gönderi, 10K–100K takipçi aralığıyla yan yana. hem erişimde hem etkileşimde benzerlerinin altında.

Medyan görüntülenme902bu hesap93710K–100K için medyan
Erişim, %1.63%bu hesap3.44%10K–100K için medyan
Etkileşim, %1.06%bu hesap1.55%10K–100K için medyan
ÖlçütBu hesap10K–100K için medyanOran
Gönderi başına medyan görüntülenme9029370.96×
Erişim (görüntülenme ÷ takipçi)1.63%3.44%0.48×
Etkileşim oranı1.06%1.55%0.69×

Bu aralıktaki diğer hesaplar →   Başka bir hesapla karşılaştır →   Bu kıyas değerleri nasıl kuruluyor →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

99516 Sep
939
902
470
306

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

4.92%16 Sep
0.53%
5.76%
1.06%
0.98%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.55%.

What the audience does

Likes77.4%89 in total
Reposts15.7%18 in total
Replies5.2%6 in total
Quotes0.9%1 in total
Bookmarks0.9%1 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Benzer hesaplar