Nat Purser ✓

@NatPurser · Washington, DC · joined 30 Apr 2009

director of us policy @averiorg | views my own

12 091Followers

2 008Following

7 724Posts total

270.6KViews on collected posts

Son gönderiler

Nat Purser ✓@NatPurser14 Sep

@NatPurser The point of Lina’s post is that the FTC can sue now and get an injunction now to stop dangerous behavior in AI development now, *before* it leads to harm or the deployment of harmful products. There is nothing “ex-post” about the FTC’s authority. There is no need fo 692 views · 35 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nat Purser ✓@NatPurser13 Sep

@NatPurser they can share weights they can open source training data really, any of the non-commercial information sharing the rest of the firms do Ant + oAI chose to be the 2 absolute most closed providers in the market, its disingenuous to act like this isnt a problem they cre 186 views · 6 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nat Purser ✓@NatPurser13 Sep

@NatPurser If the admin had thrown the book at OpenAI after they hacked hugging face, then everybody would have slowed down because they don’t want to personally go to jail. Allowing the labs to coordinate and expecting them to honor it, seems silly. But also, expecting this admi 190 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nat Purser ✓@NatPurser13 Sep

i agree that antitrust enforcers could do more under existing laws to challenge deceptive, unfair, and anticompetitive practices in ai markets now. but this doesn’t really answer the live question: how can competing labs coordinate to slow down the race dynamic she describes 62.8K views · 156 likes · 31 reposts · 17 replies Open on X →

Nat Purser ✓@NatPurser12 Sep

sincerely: if you’ve been debating going to an independent evaluator or auditor — take this as a sign. our biggest bottleneck is talent. 11.8K views · 277 likes · 12 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →

Nat Purser ✓@NatPurser12 Sep

tbh, it’s pretty crazy that frontier labs’ voluntary governance commitments are already outpacing congress by a significant margin. we should not be passing laws that set a lower bar than what frontier labs are already willing to do voluntarily. 8.5K views · 234 likes · 25 reposts · 21 replies Open on X →

Nat Purser ✓@NatPurser12 Sep

anthropic unilaterally committing to having embedded independent evaluators is BIG and worthy of commendation. they are not the only ones building the frontier. this should be standard practice across frontier companies and neolabs building similarly capable systems — 7.5K views · 187 likes · 25 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →

Nat Purser ✓@NatPurser12 Sep

we're gonna need a bigger METR 41.7K views · 685 likes · 48 reposts · 14 replies Open on X →

Nat Purser ✓@NatPurser11 Sep

this is a time where corporate power / anti-big tech watchdogs could be a strong ally to the ai safety world — they’ve spent years challenging the likes of Zuckerberg, we agree that tech execs aren’t the best stewards of our interests. but for factional reasons — we don’t like 11.3K views · 145 likes · 14 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →

Nat Purser ✓@NatPurser11 Sep

AI is not some existential alien species, it is a set of malfunctioning machines. We know how to manage this problem, and it's not by listening to a bunch of weirdo 20something cult members. https://t.co/TKW3mOx92a 31.1K views · 273 likes · 44 reposts · 14 replies Open on X →

Nat Purser ✓@NatPurser7 Jul

@NatPurser @Miles_Brundage @AVERIorg 😎 745 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nat Purser ✓@NatPurser7 Jul

@NatPurser @AlecStapp @Miles_Brundage @AVERIorg Congrats!!! 279 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nat Purser ✓@NatPurser7 Jul

@NatPurser @Miles_Brundage @AVERIorg so proud of you 💜 581 views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Nat Purser ✓@NatPurser7 Jul

some personal news: i'm thrilled to share that i’ll be joining @Miles_Brundage and the Al Verification and Evaluation Research Institute (@AVERIorg) team as Director of US Policy. i'll be working on frontier ai governance, with a focus on building the public institutions, https

93.1K views · 688 likes · 29 reposts · 101 replies Open on X →

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Son 90 güne ait 10 gönderi, 10K–100K takipçi aralığıyla yan yana. kendi kitlesinin çok ötesine gösteriliyor ve kitle tepki veriyor.

Medyan görüntülenme9 915bu hesap92410K–100K için medyan

Erişim, %82.00%bu hesap3.62%10K–100K için medyan

Etkileşim, %2.58%bu hesap1.52%10K–100K için medyan

Ölçüt	Bu hesap	10K–100K için medyan	Oran
Gönderi başına medyan görüntülenme	9 915	924	10.7×
Erişim (görüntülenme ÷ takipçi)	82.00%	3.62%	22.6×
Etkileşim oranı	2.58%	1.52%	1.69×

Bu aralıktaki diğer hesaplar → Başka bir hesapla karşılaştır → Bu kıyas değerleri nasıl kuruluyor →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

93.1K7 Jul

581

279

745

31.1K11 Sep

11.3K

41.7K12 Sep

7.5K

8.5K

11.8K

62.8K13 Sep

190

186

69214 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.88%7 Jul

1.38%

2.51%

0.94%

1.06%11 Sep

1.49%

1.79%12 Sep

2.94%

3.29%

2.52%

0.33%13 Sep

2.63%

4.84%

5.35%14 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes82.1%2 713 in total

Reposts7.0%233 in total

Replies5.9%195 in total

Quotes0.2%5 in total

Bookmarks4.8%160 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Son gönderiler

Aynı büyüklükteki hesaplara karşı

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Benzer hesaplar